Recently, the murderer of the Bei University's Battle and Chongqing sister and brother's death was performed on the same day.Because of the high degree of attention, it seemed to calmly calmly calm public opinion before the new year of the Lunar New Year, and completely drawing the two cases.
In the WeChat circle of friends, what if you don't kill Wu Xieyu?Articles have triggered a lot of discussions.In the article, I mentioned several reasons that did not kill Wu Xieyu (the auntie case). I think there are some truths.Of course, there are obviously more people think that Wu Xieyu is damn.This is also the human nature -the son's cruelly killed his mother, which is almost a great thing for China, which has always advocated filial piety.Here, I don't want to do too much discussion on the case itself, and the relevant reports have been detailed enough; and I don't want to preach the abolition of the death penalty. This is still far from the current situation of China.I just want to say that justice should maintain independence and should not always be wrapped in public opinion. They should say goodbye to the era of "not killing is not enough for civilians".
In recent years, the impact of social opinion on justice has been clearly reflected in many cases.For example, in the case of Huan Huan, Yu Huan was sentenced to life imprisonment because he stabbed his mother who was insulted to his mother. Later, after the exposure, he caused a lot of controversy. He was finally sentenced to five years in prison.If it wasn't for public opinion, it would be difficult to say whether it can be changed.But if public opinion has played a positive role, it is considered that it can affect or even replace judges at will, which is a big mistake.
Public opinion and social justice cannot be equal.There is a saying that "the eyes of the masses are clear." This sentence is okay to talk about it. If the judge treats it as a golden family, there will be big problems.
Recalling the Maggigler pattern and Nie Shubin case, which had been sensational.There were severe criminal cases in one place. Public opinion was uproar. The pressure of the case was transmitted first -level and one -level transmission to the case -handling personnel. In addition, it was in a period of strict fighting, which caused the police to make the police eagerly.For the people at the time, the execution of Huggeletu and Nie Shubin may also be the justice of punishing evil and promoting goodness and being happy.Can these two cases be turned over?From this perspective, public opinion has its limitations. It is often blindly obedient and less concerned about the facts itself.
Social opinion will have various impacts. Everyone can express their own views, but in a case, there are often many details. Most people cannot understand so clearly.In many countries, during the trial of the case, avoiding too much public opinion interference, because this will hinder judicial justice.Those who have watched the twelve angry men in the movie will feel that even if everyone thinks that it is right, they may just want to take it for granted.
For the auntie case and the fall case, these two cases are obviously not a case of unjust and false cases, but in terms of sentencing, especially whether the death penalty should be sentenced, it is probably worth considering.At least the qualitative of "no regrets and sincerity" in the judgment is a bit difficult to convince people.A person can write tens of thousands of words of remorse, and say that the motivation for crime, family changes, inner feelings, etc. are so specific and thorough. Is it "no sincerity of regret"?According to media reports, in 2019, Wu Xieyu's uncle has already said that his brother -in -law died early, so that his sister and Wu Xieyu had too much burden."Fa outside the law."Did the judges adopt these opinions?The family has chosen forgiveness, but most of the public chose not forgiveness. Whose judge's penalty is finally echoing?The answer is obvious.I think, even now, many people think that this is the intentional homicide caused by family tragedy, but these sounds have not been heard.
Volkswagen's vision is often secular, and many times are still narrow.There is a story in the twenty -four filial piety in China called "Burning Ears".On one occasion, my child and I saw on the wall of publicity and telling the story with the child. They all felt chilling.In our opinion today, an incredible story is that the ancients may be a values that are generally recognized by society.In the same way, the public's views on many issues today are also limited.It can be imagined that if this incident is not so widely reported, if Wu Xieyu does not have the identity of the North University, or he is not a mother but a father, what will this case go?
Social opinion can be affected by many factors, especially in an era of developing self -media today.In order to cater to the views and preferences of most people, many self -media authors have everything.This also leads to the ideology and values of most people in China or foreign countries.This also puts greater challenges to the judicial system of various countries today. How to maintain calmness and fairness in this increasingly hustle and bustle.
The people's indignation, the truth and justice may be absent.For a country like China that has occurred in a cultural revolution, avoiding the tyranny of most people should start with judicial independence.Wu Xieyu's life has ended, and his death should come from a fair trial, not the people's indignation.
The author is a reporter from Shandong
