Han Yongmei: Bi Danxing was charged and interpreted the ＂good politics＂ process

Under the parliamentary democracy system with uneven forces, many people have two ruler in their hearts, giving more tolerance to the disadvantaged party, it is what they are, avoiding non -illegal.The long -term ruling party can only understand this reality, but cannot be dealt with because of worrying about political rebound.

In August 2021, the Workers' Party at the time of the Shengang Collection Constituent Assembly, Sa Yisha, lied at the Congress that the police had not treated the victims of sexual assault, and then repeated the lies.Fire admits to lying by itself, Resignation .

During the process of lying on the lied, the three leaders of the Workers' Party were suspected of guiding her to repeat the lies. The Privilege Committee of the Congress began investigating in October that year, and then submitted the report to Congress debate.After that, it was decided to impose a fine of 35,000 yuan in hot Yusha, and Bi Danxing and Feisha were suspected of providing perjury and refusing to answer questions under the oath, which may constitute the charges of contempt for Congress..zaobao.com/News/Singapore/Story20220211-1241435 "R = NOFOLOW TARGET = _blank> Head for the General Procuratorate for investigation .

People who pay attention to this case are familiar with this process, and the two -year investigation feels a long time, but according to the records of past case investigation, the police need to re -call all the relevant persons, including searching for those Congress Privilege Committee.Data and so on, it is not uncommon for such a case to take a year or two.Moreover, such a high degree of attention, if the investigators are not more careful, and open each stone to look at it, it is impossible.

Looking back now, a series of political storms have occurred in the past two years, including the extramarital affairs of both parties, the former Minister of Transport Yi Huaren, and being charged with corruption.A seat, this is unprecedented.

Why did he sue Bi Danxing at this time?The conspiracy theorist thinks that this is because the election is close. Through this case, the opposition party shames again. It is beneficial to the ruling party in the election that may be held at any time within one and a half years.Although this incident will discount on the high -level impression of Bi Danxing and the leadership of the Workers' Party, it has been deducted after the investigation of the Privilege Committee to the Privilege Committee.If you want to prosecute your opponent and make politically profit in the short term, you should not have a positive effect.This is the political reality of Singapore.

Take the cities and towns that occurred before the last election. The leaders of the workers faced allegations such as "dishonesty" and "improper financial management". They also went to court. As a result, in the 2020 election two years later,The votes of the Workers' Party in the Ayu Ni settlement constituency still rose to a record high of 59.95%, and at the same time, they also won the new setting area of ​​Shenggang.At that time, the hot Yusha of the Workers' Party Shenggang campaign team also received a harsh warning from the police for publishing race and religious network remarks.Therefore, the impact of legal events before the election may not be negative, and at least it is even regarded as the disadvantaged.

The weaker those who can resonate in the crowd, especially in the restless world, everyone feels that they are weak people in some aspects.

Looking at this "Sha Lang Gate" follow -up, the General Procuratorate sued the two controls of Bi Danxing to confront the Singapore Parliament (privilege, exemption and power) law.In this article, if convicted, a fine of up to 7,000 yuan may be sentenced to three years or two years, or both are applied.Shortly after the General Prosecutor's Office was controlled by Bi Dan's face control, he issued a statement saying that the prosecution asked the court to impose a fine on each control rather than a prison. This rare measure is confusing.

In criminal cases, the prosecution's criminal rights are usually proposed at the time of the case, and the judges are sentenced to sentencing.After the defendant stated that he did not plead guilty, he issued a statement that he only requested a fine and did not fight for imprisonment, which means that Bidanxing's political career was not affected.The general procuratorate's unconventional processing has less explanation. Our colleagues in our press asked the reason why the General Procuratorate had not obtained any instructions.This is a pity that let us lose an opportunity to understand the principle of judicial torture, which can only let us interpret ourselves.

If the interrogation results, Bi Danxing will bear legal responsibility. As long as he face the fine, he will not lose the seats, and will not affect his participation in the next election. His political opponents will not score or even lose points;Successful self -evidence is innocent, and the only loser will be his political opponent at that time.

Under the parliamentary democratic system with uneven power, many people have two ruler in their hearts, giving more tolerance to the disadvantaged party, it is what they are, avoiding non -illegal.The long -term ruling party can only understand this reality, but cannot be dealt with because of worrying about political rebound.

This reminds me of Prime Minister Li Xianlong's past decade and constantly emphasize the importance of Singapore's political culture and standards.In May 2014, the concept of "constructive politics" was proposed during the second conference period of the parliament, depending on the standards, decisions and self -conclusions of political leaders.He demanded that the party's party is committed to practicing constructive politics, not only formulating rigorous and effective policies, but also requesting the character of the leader, not afraid of the advantages and disadvantages of sensitive issues of the debate, but also to maintain a high degree of integrity.Essence

After the 2015 national election, when the Congress opened in January 2016, the government's policies replaced "constructive politics" with "good politics".Good politics must maintain benign competition, not just focusing on the political and winning or losing political parties in front of them.

In the two -year policy policy, Prime Minister Li Xianlong and the then Secretary -General of the Workers' Party and the Ayu Ni set member Liu Chengqiang both argued on the two new political words.

In 2016, Liu Chengqiang said that if good politics is for good policies, Congress does not fall into a deadlock, this is a view of very narrow politics and technical bureaucratic.He believes that good politics also includes changes in the political system to ensure the toughness. Even if the ruling party is gradually corrupted or falls unexpectedly, the people can unite and maintain their survival.His good politics have four standards: tolerance, elements with gentle progress, believers in Singaporeans, and the value of politics with an open attitude.

In the next few years, Premier Li Xianlong is committed to implementing his integrity requirements for political leadership. When he encounters a problem, even the person in his own camp must dare to "be wrong."Because good politics is not the pursuit of "wins" politics, we must not only look at the interests of the short -term political parties, but consider the long -term survival of the country.

If Liu Chengqiang said at the time, if the ruling party "gradually corrupted or falls unexpectedly", there must be alternatives that can also meet the Singaporean standards and maintain national unity and survival.Should I calmly look at Bi Danxing's charged incident.If Bi Danxing can learn during training, people who have been trained by the strong have the opportunity to become a stronger opponent.

Regardless of his lawsuit, his political prospects can only be decided by voters in the election without being suspended because of this lawsuit.I don't know if the General Prosecutor's Office does not ask for a imprisonment punishment.Because they don't answer, we can only guess.