Let's return to the original intention of character and citizen education, and think about what kind of citizens we have to shape.Righteousness, perseverance, respect for others, and caring compatriots naturally do not talk about it. Based on this, we must also distinguish between right and wrong and grasp.
Discussing the dissatisfaction with the Ministry of Education caused by the conflict caused by the conflict caused by the conflict between the character and the citizen education class, once again illustrates that this conflict is not far away from us, and the development of the situation will affect the sensitive nerves of individual communities in Singapore.Not to mention whether there is any side of the Warfire front line occupying a moral highland. In history, who is the victims, the public says that the publicity is reasonable, and the use of this topic as a textbook is a difficult test for the teacher.
The simplest solution is to delete the contents of the haha in the classes of the character in the education course.But simple is not necessarily desirable, because the discussion of current affairs issues is missing in the classroom, just like an anchoring in the external massive information, and the sensitive speech is easy to dominate public opinion.If you are blindly avoided because of complexity and difficulties, you can only avoid it for a while. In the future, the similar situation will test Singapore's social cohesion again, and the social response ability will be more insufficient.In this regard, the intention of the Ministry of Education still has a positive side.
Parents who expressed dissatisfaction also proposed other criticism that the textbook only focused on the development of the incident after October 7 last year and the atrocities of only mentioned in the statement, but did not mention the words that violated the humanitarian violations of humanitarianism.EssenceEven though the Ministry of Education has stated that the textbook is updated on a regular basis, there are still people on the Internet that the official is intentionally "concealed the truth."
A large Ministry of Education, how can we do such a thing in textbooks for the students of the majority of students across the country?It is said that the official has concealed, and the implication is that the character and citizen education class are politicized. One of the parties that deliberately maintain and favors the conflict in the textbooks, instill false information.However, Singapore has repeatedly expressed the diplomatic position that supports the two countries' plans, and called for suspension of fire and protecting civilians in the United Nations. The textbook also clarifies how Singapore thinks of the relationship with Isaipa; second, if these netizens say, the Ministry of Education will make it.The discussion contrary to government discussions, without considering the backbone of the biased discussion, it is also too insulting the IQ of officials of the Ministry of Education.
Textbooks spread to the Internet, most people report that the textbooks are quite neutral and there is no favoritism.This is nothing more than an elegant textbook, but it is interpreted as a different purpose, because people who have opinions on the textbooks may not be flat.
Some people have judged themselves in social media videos, commenting on the situation thinking questions in the textbooks and the source of quoting reports.Guide critical thinking.As everyone knows, this has committed the fallacy of the characteristics of character and the teaching goals of citizen education classes with historical courses.
These versatile words have exerted the skills of critical thinking.Critical thinking is to help us distinguish the subtext and credibility of literature and copywriting. However, in the times of the times with diverse views, the more contending of the era, as if the more critical thinking, the more we can occupy a place in the view market.
However, the dispute between rational debates and spirit is actually the difference.After the Ministry of Education responded to the parents' public letter from the aspects of the course, teaching methods, and depth of content, individual social media groups also tightly bite the textbooks without fully presenting the facts, and the cuts are constantly rational and chaotic.Everyone knows that many topics cannot be divided into absolute right or wrong, not to mention the historical grievances behind Harbin conflict.All parties have expressed their views, and things should be ordered.
The right or wrong of history is not a patent of anyone. Similarly, how to maintain social harmony does not rely on the government to say it, but to rely on everyone's joint bearing.How to serve the society with what you have learned, rather than the fastness of your own tongue, it is not the essence of character and citizen education.
