Former Prime Minister continued to play suggestions in the cabinet as a government as a government, and to avoid imposing his views on the current Prime Minister, it was a political art to the cabinet.

At the Sixth Bloomberg Innovation Economic Forum dinner held on November 8th, Bloomberg editor -in -chief Mi Siwei made a small observation during the interview Prime Minister Li Xianlong, which was interesting.At that time, Mi Siwei visited the founding Prime Minister Li Guangyao shortly after receiving Prime Minister Li Xianlong. He was surprised that Lee Kuan Yew has actually worked in the room in the cabinet conference room.Mi Siwei was amazing about this, and I could only guess that he thought it was a bit inconsistent with etiquette.

When the second prime minister Wu Zongdong took over the burden of governing the country from Li Guangyao, he had considered whether to move the Prime Minister's Office out of the Presidential Palace.This is the first time the post of Singapore Prime Minister's position. There is no previous example to follow. One of the opinions that Lee Kuan Yew gave him at the time was that if he wanted to retain the continuity of the policy, he should not move the Prime Minister's Office out of the presidential palace because if this is done, it is equivalent to it, which is equivalent to it.He said to the Chinese people that he would change or keep a distance from the first generation of political leaders.Therefore, Li Guangyao suggested that he take over his office and expressed his preparation for the room of another presidential palace he had already seen.However, Wu Zuodong did not dare to drive Lee Kuan Yew for his respect for Lee Kuan Yew, so he renovated another room as the office of the Prime Minister.

Wu Zuodong recorded the episodes of the year when he was in high interview with high interviews.He said that in the Western democratic country, as soon as the leader was in place, it was the same as others; but Singapore had its own set, and the former Prime Minister had to take care of the new prime minister.

The so -called "not in its position, not conspiring its politics" does not seem to apply to Singapore.Former Prime Minister continued to play the conspirators in the cabinet as a government, and to avoid imposing his views on the current Prime Minister, it was a political art to the cabinet.

Singapore is different from this set of other democratic countries. It is still effective so far. Whether it can be maintained in the future needs to be observed.Premier Li recently announced at the 70th anniversary of the Party's Creative Party that he would take over the deputy prime minister and Minister of Finance Huang Xuncai before November 21 next year.At that time, what role Li will play at that time is a question in the minds of the Chinese people.Mi Siwei's question shows that this is also interested in international media.

Premier Li's response is that this is a very delicate thing. The predecessor had to "overwatching", but it could not be "overbearing".You must "use proper and wise words, not the style of restraining your successor."Premier Li came over and knew where the "predecessor" was.

The change of leaders will always bring some new weather, which is expected by the Chinese people.In fact, the fourth generation has done a lot of pavement for the official succession, such as in the topic of rising living expenses.

In Singapore, the government does not talk about social benefits, but only says "social contracts", which means all levels of life.Under the banner of "Singapore together", the participation of the whole people is mobilized without leaving a top -down political movement.

From the government's mouth, there are no abstract words, or political terms.Premier Li said at the Bloomberg Innovation Economic Forum dinner: "Singapore is currently in the stage of doing more and helping each other together.Human positions have always been changed because of the new generation of the stage.

Bi Danxing, the leader of the worker party, recently said in Congress debate that considering that the government can allocate 1.1 billion yuan in assistance supporting the fiscal budget, and the current financial performance, the Workers' Party questioned whether it is necessary to increase the consumption tax next year next year.EssenceA few days ago, the Workers' Party proposed a "crisis of living expenses" in Congress, urging the government to review policies to reduce the pressure on living expenses faced by Singaporeans and families.The starting point of the people's concern for the people is consistent, but each expresses it.

The government can allocate huge sums of money outside the budget to relieve the trapped of the people, which means that the state treasury is enriched. Since the treasury is "full of money", why should we continue to increase the consumption tax?The opposition party's argument may be resonated with some people, but it also reflects the fact that the government must make money in order to plan ahead and take a random response.

Xu Fangda, Minister of High -level and Minister of Finance Xu Fangda, refuted the argument of the Workers: "The opposition must be frank and maintain a consistent position.The income obtained from the consumption tax "

"

While raising consumption taxes while raising consumption taxes, there are many subsidies, which seem to be contradictory, but "the clever woman is difficult to cook without rice."Where does rice come from?The common people of the civilians cannot understand the mystery. They think that rising living expenses is caused by policies, so they do not take all the government's subsidy allowances as one thing.

The DAP Wuji Ban asked the district councilor Lian Ronghua to revise the words of the Workers' Party, emphasizing that "Congress clearly knows that living expenses are issues of global attention, and called on the government to continue the policies to reduce the pressure of life facing Singaporeans and their families ..."It is obviously to show that care for the suffering of the folk is not the patent of the opposition party.The eight workers and two members of the non -elected district of the advanced party opposed the invalidation. The final passing was an inevitable result.

This debate that exceeds seven hours has awakened the fourth -generation leader of the official succession at the end of the year.