The High Court of Guangdong Province made a second trial judgment on six people including Liang Jianguang, the leader of Shenzhen's black organization, to dismiss the appeal and maintain the original judgment.
The Guangdong Higher Court reported on the WeChat public account on Thursday (October 26), and made a second trial of the first case of the six people including Liang Jianguang, the leader of Shenzhen -related organizations, Liang Jianguang, and other six people.The appeal was dismissed, the original sentence was maintained, the death penalty was approved by Liang Jianguang, and the execution of the two years was slow, and the political rights were deprived of the life.
Earlier, the first instance of the Shenzhen Municipal Intermediate Court organized the crime of organizing and leading the underworld, intentional injury, kidnapping, robbery, extortion of extortion, gathered crime, provoking trouble, counting crimes and punishment, and punishment, and punishment.The defendant Liang Jianguang was sentenced to death for two years, deprived of political rights for life, and fined 1.01 million yuan (about 190,000 yuan) and other property sentences.
The remaining five defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment for three years.And Zhao Zhongqiang, Lin Dingxing, and Huang Henglin sentenced the property sentence according to law.After the sentence, some defendants appealed.
The court trial found that in the early 1990s, Liang Jianguang gathered social idlers to be stubborn and fierce in Guanlan, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, and gradually formed it as an organizer and leader.There are a large number of people with a large number of people, a clear level, and a fixed underworld organization.
The organization has used monopoly waste products, "seeing", "receipts", opening a casino, start -ups, monopoly bus line operations, and barrel water sales.A series of illegal and criminal acts such as intentional injury, forced transactions, robbery, etc., caused one person to die, multiple people were injured, severely damaged the local economic and social life order, causing extremely bad impacts.
The court of second instance believes that the judgment of the first instance determines that the facts are clear, the evidence is true, sufficient, the applicable law and conviction are accurate, the sentencing is appropriate, and the trial procedure is legal.
