Deng Bingqiang, director of the Hong Kong Security Bureau, said that taking pictures of the ban on places does not constitute a crime of espionage, and shows that the spy activity refers to the intention to endanger national security.
Comprehensive Hong Kong Radio website and online media "Hong Kong 01" Sunday (March 10) reported that a bill committee of the Hong Kong Legislative Council continued to consider the draft national security regulations on the maintenance of 23 of the basic law.
The draft mentioned that the actions of spy activities include "close, inspect, pass or below or below, enter or accept forbidden places, or appear in adjacent places."In this regard, many members raised relevant questions.
Some members ask questions, and some military facilities are people's residences near some military facilities. If citizens have violated the law nearby; some members have asked if there are photography enthusiasts receiving compensation to take photos of military ban facilities, but it has no intention to harm the harm itself.Is national security illegal?
Deng Bingqiang said that the spy activity refers to the intention to endanger national security. If the entrance of the penalty area is purely photographic, it will not constitute a spy activity.He also said that some military restricted areas are located on the mountain. If the citizens have made mistakes when climbing the mountain, although the behavior has been illegal, whether it will be prosecuted to consider different factors and may be warned.
Deng Bingqiang said that if the shooting related to the ban has no intention to harm national security and it is not illegal.Other crimes under the violation of the regulations.
In addition, some members pay attention to whether the private land is divided into the restricted area after being divided by the government, and will compensate the land owner in accordance with the recovery of the land.Lin Dingguo, director of the Hong Kong Department of Justice, said that the division of the restricted area does not mean that the government will seize land ownership, so it does not involve land acquisition compensation.
