Whether based on the ideal vision or real interests, a diverse tolerant, gentle, rational, and more secular United States, for me and my family, it must be better than an extreme nativeism, exacerbating and conservative extreme principles.Essence
For the possible policy of the United States Democratic and Republican Party, or in short, Trump and Harris's possible policies have already had overwhelming analysis and comments.These comments have basically reached a consensus regardless of whether they are first -class international relations scholars from China or ordinary Chinese mainland netizens.Challenges and threats, and the only difference between the two parties is just a strategy, that is, the combined competition with other countries and China, and at the same time seek to ease and cooperate -this can be seen from the recent visit to China, the national security consultant,Bar up with the allies, hesitant to choose from China; is it steady and steady, can be expected, or strange, and do not play cards according to cards.Therefore, the observer in China can indeed say that both parties are similar. See how Chinese soldiers themselves will block, the water is covered, or the soil is simply walking an extreme.His feet were disrupted, but he helped China.
Election is not worth so enthusiastic about the secular process
However, I can't think of anyone in the United States.The reason is very simple. For the Chinese who live in China, this is indeed a big scene of watching fire from the other side. Just like the epidemic occurred in China, the Chinese have sent various materials to China, and Americans just hang up and hang themselves high.However, for everyone who has long lived in the United States and even entered, and children growing up in the United States, everyone cannot be established because it is related to our interests.
As a American citizen, I clearly tend to the Democratic Party.If according to the standards of represented bourgeoisie and the rich in Republican history, people like me who are relying on teaching to make a living will definitely not be related to them. According to the current trend, the Republican Party has become anti -globalization, conservativeism, localism, and racism.The spokesperson, I am neither white nor conservative, nor do I have lived in generations of people who do not even appear in the state. It is even more meaningless to support such political parties.Value.
In addition, by my side, most American Chinese are Christians, and I am not.I also saw a Chinese female Christian who was well -known on the Internet on my own. He prayed for Trump in a megacities and published prayer words.I don't accept this.No matter who I choose, I can only accept their policy orientation based on relatively pleasing to the eye and compare, but not who can write into prayer words or worship the Bodhisattva for it, because the election is just a secular process and is not worth so hot.Not only is the voting rate of the US election itself low, but there are fewer and fewer devout Christians, but the Chinese maintain a high ratio of Christians. They generally believe it after leaving China, and why Chinese Christians strongly support it stronglyTrump, the connection here is not to be detailed in this article.
The focus of my attention is the characteristics of the two presidential candidates, as well as the domestic policies and its possible impacts.In my opinion, the United States really needs a president that is different from traditional today.So far, only Obama has broken through the convention of white people as presidents, and Harris has been elected not only to break through the dual -potential rules of race and gender, but also break the oversupply of the past two presidents in the United States in the past two years.The United States is indeed a special country. Under multiple appearances, its core power must be in the hands of white men by default, and most of the presidents in history are descendants of British immigrants and are tall and burly.In other words, in the cultural psychology of Americans, people such as the United States have grown from blue wrapping to the road of the road to a person who grows into a super power to determine the world. It is basically default to a firm and decourse white male Christian.This is of course understandable, but it does not reflect the increasingly visible ethnic diversification, the political rise of women, and the demands of the new generation.
Even when I was elected in Obama, I observed calmly. I did not have to gather together like some progressive Chinese friends to celebrate, "Finally one ..." But today, I would think that if a non -white female president was successfully elected,It will bring a major turning point to the entire American history and ethnic history.Even in the symbolic sense, this change is worthy of welcome and expectations, because the female head of state is not new in other countries, but the special and "exception" of the United States restricts this.
For expected policies, I have never supported the ban on abortion based on religious principles.Anyone knows according to secular reason and common sense.It must be a backward backward.The trend of human civilization will eventually be the guarantee and respect for the rights of secular individuals, rather than the absolute maintenance of religion and ideology formed by any historical form.
Conservatives are obsessed with guns' amazing psychology
The conservatives supported by the Republican Party also include obsession with guns.Like the obsession with abortion, the worship of guns of American conservatives is amazing.Guns with large -scale killing functions have long become a huge threat to public safety. The negative effects of killing innocent innocentness have long exceeded the so -called self -defense.Strangely, the attention of conservative party embryo's right to life is far more than paying attention to the right to live life in reality.The so -called spontaneous "resistance of the tyrannical" is just self -deception, because the United States has clear legal provisions to enter the federal government's industries to prohibit carry weapons.Government agencies serving the public in the Social Security Bureau and other people must be security inspection. It is not allowed to carry weapons. Instead, there is no strict gun ban on primary and secondary schools.Regardless of how the ceiling is chaotic, it is also possible to ask only with the common sense of the world: If the person who wants to "resist the tyranny" is illegal to enter the government agency with a gun, how can you "resist the tyranny" to hold the gun?This is obviously the "22nd military regulations" in reality.Although Harris's campaign partner Walz was a gunman, after a large -scale shooting case, he turned to the position of banning assault weapons, which shows that he has a rational and pragmatic distinction between his personal hobbies and public interests.
Due to Harris's immigration and mixed -race background and female identity, it can be expected that if she was elected, she should be more tolerant and supportive in terms of immigration and cultural diversification.Although the United States is facing a lot of headaches to the border with a large number of illegal immigrants, in recent years, it has also obvious that the rise of white people's nationalism and the growth of ectopic emotions, as well as diversified retrogression.In this process, it was Trump's popularization of his followers and imitators to help the flames.Violence has created a very unfriendly social atmosphere.Indeed, Trump supporters in white people are not all under the economic sense, but they are all related to regional occlusion, small horizons, aging, and low education.Rigid and conservative.
From the perspective of the first generation of Asian immigrants, the white group that has a general population and political and economic status is brewing such trends and policies. It is not possible for the Asian groups that are obviously weak.Whether it is based on the ideal vision or realistic interests, a diverse tolerant, gentle, rational, and more secular United States, for me and my family, must be better than an extreme original conservativeist American in the United States.
The author is an associate professor at the Department of History of the Academy of Academy in the United States
