For these upcoming consequences and disasters, if it is not managed properly, AIGC is not creating new products, nor is it to promote and create a new civilized form, but to retreat, go back to counterfeiting, deception and deception and deception and deception and deception.Destruction is to make the barbaric roll again.

The World Internet Conference Wuzhen Summit opened on November 8th. At this time, the world Internet enters the "Wuzhen Time" as scheduled. Human unlimited energy and infinite charm of the Internet are fully displayed. A variety of artificial intelligence generation contentAIGC) also appeared one by one.However, when AIGC rises and has an explosive growth of the content created by generatory AI tools ChatGPT and Midjourney, there is also a dark current surging, that is, repeated evil uses AIGC.This evil is not only a prank, but also deepened to fraud and becomes a combination of fraud.AI security has become a hot spot for global attention.

Because of this, on November 1, the first Global Artificial Intelligence Security Summit was held in the UK, and participants, including the United States, China, and the European Union, signed a Blachley declaration.The declaration pointed out that AI has brought huge opportunities to the world, and it has potential to change or enhance human well -being, peace and prosperity.However, AI also brings major risks, including in the field of daily life. "All problems are crucial. We confirm that solving their necessity and urgency."

AI security issues are the most circulated on the Internet during this time, which is a spoof celebrity speech and false news generated by AI.Chinese actor Zhao Benshan tells the story of the Northeast with a standard London Cafe English, and the cross talk actor Guo Degang uses English to speak authentic Chinese cross talk.After that, politicians from various countries made their debut, and the "Biden" speech publicly announced the start of the Third World War; "Macron" live broadcast "Government Employment Destroyer";Wenxiong's false video speech is circulated in social media ...

All these are only AIGC, including voice, images, and videos.On the surface, it is a spoof and joke. As the producer of Kishida Video said, "The purpose of my doing this is to make people laugh, this is a kind of irony," but it is essentially fraud.Misling society may lead to social confusion and division, causing conflict, and even war.

The most serious consequences have a precedent.On October 20, 2020, Patty, a teacher of a teacher school in the suburbs of Paris, France, was shot shot because of the comics of Muhammad, a controversial Muslim Prophet Muhammad because of the free speech on the classroom.As early as January 7, 2015, the headquarters of Charlie Weekly, France, was also attacked by terrorist.comics.

Imagine that if you use AIGC, whether you generate the voice of controversial figures or religious characters or pictures, or speeches, it may cause conflict, terrorist activities, and massacre. MoreoverThe author of the speech video said that he only took an hour throughout the process.

Even after AIGC will be discovered to be fraud, no one can control the consequences and disasters after the bomb explosion.Moreover, AIGC is more likely to cause some other consequences that can occur at any time, such as the property of the property, the portrait portrait and the generating content infringement, which not only violates the copyright, but also destroys the intellectual property rights.Upside down, misleading tens of millions of readers and the entire society.

If these are about to be managed properly, AIGC is not creating new products, nor is it to promote and create a new civilization form, but to go backwards, go back to counterfeiting, deception and destruction, that is, that is, that is, that is, that is, it is that is, that is, that is, that is, it is that is, that is, that is, that is, that is, it is that is.Let the barbaric roll come back again.In the face of this situation, the academic and intellectual circles should be clearer and sober, and have been calling for measures.

As a mainstream publication in the field of international science, Britain's nature published on June 7 this year, saying that it is naturally not allowed to use AIGC in images and videos, and explained why.

The root cause of "No" for the visual content of AI -generated images and video is that this is related to many problems such as integrity, consent, privacy and intellectual property protection of scientific research.In addition to articles specifically for AI, at least in the foreseeable future, Natural Magazine will not publish photos, videos, or illustrations created by generating -generated AI creations.

Whether it is scientific research, text creation and art works, during the publishing process, the essence is the truth, and it is based on the common commitment of integrity.Natural researchers, editors and publishers need to know the source of data and images to verify their accuracy and authenticity.However, the existing generation AI tool does not provide access to the source of the product, so it cannot verify the authenticity of the work.

In addition, it is allowed to quote the works and results of others in the creation, but the source and source must be indicated, which is also the core principle of science and art.Unfortunately, AIGC does not meet this principle, and such principles cannot be changed, otherwise it will support plagiarism and fraud.

AIGC also exists: agreeing and permission.AIGC is generated after obtaining a large number of works that has been produced and published. It is necessary to obtain the consent of the original author and creator before or after, but AIGC is difficult to get the consent of the original creator.Whether it is Biden or Zhao Benshan's AI -generating product, neither has the consent of the producers, such as photographers who shoot these people or the consent of the original video, and the creator of the original text textagree.

For AIGC, it is not impossible to make and use, but to create and use on the basis of standardizing and law -abiding.China has issued regulations. The central law is that the content generated by the generated formula AI should be true and accurate to prevent false information from generating false information while respecting the legitimate interests of others.

However, the specific implementation and details of these regulations must also be slowly polished in practice in order to gradually mature and in place.

The author is Beijing scholar