Source: Surging News
Author: Li Qinyu
Some netizens broke the news that they asked all students to wear helmets to school in Jiaowei Township Central Elementary School, Xuwen County, Zhanjiang City, Guangdong, China.During the promotion process, the requirements were too strict, and the Education Bureau had notified the school to rectify.
The school requires parents and students to wear helmets when they are traveling electric cars and motorcycles. This is of course a good thing.Although it is obviously unnecessary to walk and take a helmet by car, as some netizens say, this is also a "responsible" attitude towards traffic safety and campus safety.Besides, the requirements are too "strict", so it is good to rectify as soon as possible.In this case, why does the "little thing" wearing a helmet still cause heated discussions and worry people?
According to media reports, "entering the campus with a helmet" is the unified requirement of the Zhanjiang Education Bureau -students and parents should do a good job of "one helmet, one person, one hat" to ensure traffic safety, and when entering schoolThe helmet and the schoolbag are brought into the classroom at the same time.It should be worn by wearing a helmet, but according to common sense, you can wear it when you get on electric cars and motorcycles. Is it necessary for children to learn the helmet every day?From this point of view, it is not just a certain elementary school that requires too "strictness".
It is not difficult to understand. Why does a primary school ask children to walk and wear a helmet when taking a car -the unified requirement of the superior department is so "strict", so the grass -roots unit must be more implemented, and it must be even more necessary to be even more implemented."Strict", this is caused by the pressure passed from top to bottom.
Continuously improving traffic safety and campus safety is the common mission of the whole society.But people should also know that developing good habits, such as wearing a helmet when riding a bicycle, can only step by step, making it a consciousness of internalization.There is no shortcut to go, and there is no pioman cricket to eat. For example, relying on a unified "requirement" to achieve the purpose, it is obviously unrealistic.
A simple truth, if you do not have a good sense of security, then even if parents and students wear helmets when they are riding bicycles, they may also be dangerous because they do not comply with traffic rules.Therefore, the rectification operation has its own role, but it must not be anti -customer -oriented.In order to avoid various "requirements" become unnecessary burdens of grass -roots units and the people, they have become formalism, and they should be cautious enough when pushing it to society.
Of course, grassroots governance has its own complexity.For example, to make some parents and children have good safety habits, it may be difficult to promote some specific measures.I believe that the local education bureau must have its own consideration.However, after all, rectification cannot be the norm, and it will always withdraw from the stage in the future.In any case, unconventional methods cannot be regarded as "reasonable", and the extension of "wearing a helmet" is infinitely expanded.
This is why people are worried about why people are worried because of "wearing helmets on walking and getting in school": If managers are "strict" if they are "strict", it is likely that many good practices will move at the level of execution level.On the other hand, it violates the original intention.In short, instead of letting children go to school with a burden helmet every day, it is better to adopt a lot of praise and likes to encourage them to remind parents to wear helmets together when they pick up and drop off. Is it better?
