Source: Xinjing News
Author: Xingyu (media person)
Liu Haiyang, a student of Tsinghua University's "sulfuric acid splashing bear" for netizens, has become an expert in the Chinese Academy of Sciences after many years. On July 6, the Institute of Microelectronics Research of the Chinese Academy of Sciences responded to the cover news that Liu Haiyang was indeed at this time.In the work of the hospital, the relevant staff said, "All the recruitment procedures of Liu Haiyang are compliant, and he has been punished by Tsinghua University before."
Tsinghua University, which occurred in 2002, was a sulfuric acid injury -wounding bear in the school, which attracted widespread attention in the society.Experts on how to punish, education, law, and zoos have also expressed their opinions at the time.In the end, Liu Haiyang was given to the school by Tsinghua University for inspection.At the same time, "After experiencing long -term discussions and controversy, the Xicheng District Court of Beijing decided that Liu Haiyang had intentionally destroyed the crime of destruction of property. However, in view of its consistent and excellent academic learning, there was regret performance after the incident, and it was decided to avoid criminal punishment."
It should be said that the result of this treatment was comprehensive consideration of the concept and legislative status of social animal protection at that time, as well as the personal situation of the parties.
For more than 20 years, the old things were repeated. People found that Liu Haiyang's identity was already an associate researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. It became an expert who could stand alone in the relevant research field. It is reasonable to say that this is a gratifying thing.Because this means that even if he made a mistake and was punished that year, Liu Haiyang still "forced shame and forge ahead", successfully embarked on the avenue of life, and realized personal value and social value.To a large extent, this also highlights the realistic value of Tsinghua University's principle of "education help and giving way out" that Tsinghua University.
But from the feedback of the public opinion field, there is a sound that seems to be trying to "turn the old account". It is obviously an upside -down in the end of the time to infer the unreasonable punishment at the time.It should be seen that Liu Haiyang's punishment at the time and being detained for one month were eventually exempted from criminal punishment, indicating that he had paid the price for his actions at the time.
On this basis, Liu Haiyang's individual can grow into talents, including subsequent enrollment and studies, which is the result of personal efforts, and cannot be used as an unreasonable basis for sanctions at that time.In fact, an important connotation of the spirit of modern rule of law is -punishment is just means rather than purpose. It is a big fallacy to measure the legitimacy of punishment with whether one person has a future.
From the process of studying to being hired by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Liu Haiyang did not leave a criminal case at that time. As long as his achievements and performance were in line with the requirements of schools and units, this was also fully complied with procedural specifications.After all, there are no laws and regulations that it is clear that those who have made mistakes such as Liu Haiyang have completely blocked personal growth and employment.
Therefore, in this matter, everything should be returned to the perspective of law and rights to review, and continue to take the mistakes made by Liu Haiyang's past, as well as the identity of their famous school graduates, it may not be a harsh blame andNarrow, it is easy to bring "wrong injuries" to the parties and related units.
In fact, the matter was re -placed under the time of public opinion, and some of its existing remarks. Compared with the public opinion that Liu Haiyang encountered, and the punishment he finally suffered, it was very intriguing.
For example, this can't help but think about whether our public opinion world is more tolerant or narrow?Is it more rational or more emotional?Is our respect for personal rights stronger, or is it even worse?In fact, these problems are related to the quality of public life in our society, and they are also about everyone's rights and interests.
In modern society, no one must be carrying their own mistakes for a lifetime.The discussion of "sulfuric acid splashing bears" is not impossible, but the guidance is a rational discussion, not a suspicious emotional vent.
