China's official plan clarifies several invalid bully clauses in the prepaid consumption, and will not collect the operators or provide services in accordance with the agreed goods or provide services, and avoid consumers apply for refunds.Fraud.
Comprehensive CCTV News and Voice of China reported that the Chinese Supreme People's Court issued a draft of judicial interpretation of pre -paid civil disputes on Thursday (June 6) on Thursday (June 6), and publicly solicited opinions from the society.The deadline for soliciting opinions is June 20.
The prepaid consumption of the standardized manuscript specification refers to the field of consumption fields such as retail, accommodation, catering, fitness, travel, haircuts, beauty, education and training.Pay to consumers to trade or provide services.
According to the draft of the solicitation, the court can determine the six format clauses in accordance with the laws and interests of the consumer rights and interests, the civil code, etc., which involves the exclusion of consumers to terminate the contract in accordance with the law or request the right to repay the prepaid.Unreasonable restrictions on consumer transfer prepaid consumer contract rights, agreed that consumers do not make up after the prepaid card of the prepaid card, agreed that the operator has the right to unilaterally change the substantive content of the contract, exempt the operator's defective guarantee and losses of compensation, and eliminate consumption.The court of residence is under the jurisdiction of the residence, and the format clauses that unreasonably increase consumer rights protection costs.
The operator has fictional or exaggerated the quality, function, function and efficacy of service, and the content and efficacy of services, misleading consumers for prepaid consumption;Formulating consumption; and after receiving prepaid, termination of operations, not neither redeeming goods or providing services, and maliciously evading consumers to apply for refunds, the operator constitutes fraud and shall bear the liability for punitive compensation.
Soliciting comments draft also proposes that if consumers do not understand the product and service information, they may apply for no reason within seven days after the prepaid.
It is reported that after the consumer purchased the prepaid card, the operators encountered the operators "moving the store", "transfer", "roll running", "routine marketing" or "malicious debt escape", etc.dispute.
Many Chinese consumers have encountered it, buying goods and services prepaid to recharge, but when consumer, they find that the service "shrinks";It was rejected for various reasons.
