In response to the proposal to include a number of Hong Kong judges, prosecutors and government officials into the sanctions list, the Hong Kong Secretary of Justice, Lin Dingguo, said that similar incidents did not happen for the first time.No message made him suspect that this would affect the judge's performance.
Members of the two House of Representatives in the United States launched the Hong Kong Sanctions Act on November 2, asking for 49 Hong Kong judges, prosecutors and officials on the US sanctions list. Many of them are the designated judges of the Hong Kong National Security Law.Essence
Comprehensive Ming Pao and Sing Tao Daily Sunday (November 19) reported that Lin Dingguo said in the wireless program that he and many legal circles from all over the world on the "Hong Kong Law Week"When they came to Hong Kong, they described them to the incidents, and they understood that the incident was political.
He said that although he did not contact the relevant judges directly, there was no message or information that made him suspect that it would affect the judge's performance.
In this case, whether it means to start Article 55 of the Hong Kong National Security Law and hand over the national security cases to mainland China. Lin Dingguo responded that it is impossible to answer hypothetical questions, but Article 55 of the National Security Law is an exception.The final decision was approved by the central government, so the right to speak was in the hands of the central government.
Lin Dingguo also said that once Article 55 of the National Security Law was launched and the national security case was submitted to mainland China for trial, the National Security Office would be responsible for investigation.Specify the court handling.
Asked how many lawyers in Hong Kong are currently in accordance with the qualifications to respond to the defendant in the Mainland, Lin Dingguo bluntly said that he had never thought about this problem and believed that it should be theoretically based on the rules of mainland China.
He emphasized that even if the case was tried by mainland China, the criminal proceedings were different. The defendant could also enjoy the right to answer in accordance with the law.thing.