Because the Labor Party has been in the wild in the wild, it cannot receive all materials about China, especially national security, how to balance economic and national security, it is estimated that the future Labor government will continue to be able to bypass British -China relations in the future.The problem.
NATO is full of patience to China.Last week, NATO publicly accused Beijing of "the decisive supporter of the Russia's Ukraine War". Until the issue of being treated with China for nearly two and a half years, the members of the member states reached a consensus.
I once thought that "West" is an indispensable collective term.During Trump's administration in the United States, this term was broken because Trump advocated that he only paid attention to the United States, and Europe and NATO have nothing to do with themselves.Until Biden was governed and rebuilt the Western camp.However, while Biden was in power, with the promotion of Russia and China, the global southern countries began to gather, trying to collectively leverage the status of the world's leading world leader for more than 70 years.
The dissatisfaction with China during the Obama period was only hidden in the belly of the US government.Later, the U.S. government publicly expressed his intentions to China, began in the Trump era's trade war.The Chinese government once hopes that after Biden's throne, it can cool the fire.On the surface, the gentle Biden treats China is not tough, but it is not weak.Although the two parties in the United States are seriously differentiated on the left and right wings, it has been highly unified on the Chinese issue.
But for a long time, a powerful China does not mean challenges in the eyes of European countries, nor is it a threat. It may still be a chance.In particular, those European institutions that have long been used to relying on China, such as universities, luxury companies, automobile industry, daily necessities importers, etc., Chinese markets and Chinese manufacturing are the best sources of profit.Moreover, China has challenged the United States, and European countries such as Portugal, Spain, France, Britain, Germany and other European countries have long taken turns to Europe, knowing that Feng Shui has taken turns.Views turned to India again).In China and the United States, Europeans have been trying to obtain the sweetness of fishermen.France is the best example. President Macron chose to stand between China and the United States and try to reconcile people.Not long ago, the heads of state and France also visited each other.
In the two years when patiently watched and not criticized China, NATO has been looking forward to the Chinese government can give up supporting Russia, because confrontation with Russia and China at the same time is not a wise choice.The United States Nixon and China dealt with the Soviet Union at that time.
Ukrainian President Zelei Kisky's patience with China can also be described as long: he has been left out, but he has been waiting for a day, hoping to wait until the Chinese government turns.However, both Macron and Zelianzki were disappointed in China.At the beginning of May this year, Chinese President Xi Jinping visited France.Macron urges China to end the Ukrainian war by using the influence on Russia. The response obtained is that France and China should jointly work to prevent the emergence of "new cold war" between the global groups on the issue of trade.
On June 2nd, Zeleizki directly named China in the Q & A session of Shangri -La's dialogue, saying that Russia "uses China's regional influence, uses Chinese diplomats, and uses all means" to destroy the Peak Summit.He said: "Unfortunately, such a huge, independent and powerful China has become a tool in Putin."
Whether Sino -Russian relations are as saying "China is a tool for Putin", it is not easy to judge.The Communist Party of the Soviet Union had bred the Chinese government, has a large handbelt, and provided various funds and technical support; when Mao Zedong himself became a climate, and wanted to be the boss of a socialist camp, he turned his face to become opposite.At the beginning of Putin's attack on Ukraine, the public opinion war under the command of the Chinese government made most Chinese (including elites) once believed that it was wrong in NATO and the United States; China supported Russia, which means that China will be able to dominate Putin in the future.
The Labor government has not clarified the positioning of British -China relations
Based on NATO's criticism of China, without China ’s technology and material assistance to Russia, Putin’ s war on Ukraine cannot continue to be so long.However, Putin does not seem to pay attention to China's attitude to China, which has contributed so much. His interoperability and intimate contact with North Korea should not be welcomed by China, but it has not been seen in public.——In the outside world is unknown.Perhaps all three countries are stepping on steel wires.However, China has resolutely standing with Russia, even if it offended Putin as the most dangerous enemies, the choice of fish and bear's paw can also provide right to judge credentials in the future.
Therefore, until now, NATO has reached a unified attitude towards China. It is logical, because it is no longer expected by "China will leave Putin". In the future, fighting against Russia and China at the same time is a reality that must be accepted.
At the NATO Summit, the left side of Bayon was NATO Secretary -General Stoltenberg, and on the right is the newly released Labor Prime Minister Stammer on the right, which shows the important position of Britain in NATO.But how the Britain will deal with British -Chinese relations under Sturu's rule has no clear concept so far.
Earlier, the Conservative Party tried to play the "international environmental danger" card in the election.In May of this year, in a public speech delivered by former Prime Minister Sonak in the UK, he directly picked up four "autocratic national axis": China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran, thinking that they were the biggest threat since the Cold War.But during the entire election, foreign affairs were not the focus of campaign.Since voters do not care, the Labor Party has not made clear positioning in the future.
The only clue comes from Stammer's speech in NATO. He said: 'We live in a dangerous new era ... In a turbulent era, we face the threat of generations in Russia, as well as North Korea and Iran and other countries.The help of the Middle East and North Africa, the challenges and terrorism of China, the challenges of China."
The "challenge" of Chinese tables is not a threat, nor is it the core of the autocracy. This is probably the position of the former Conservative government on China in 2022.However, for the Labor Party, a party member who supports "Pacifism", it emphasizes the importance of attaching importance to national security, and returns to the Prime Minister's palace after 14 years of wild.Time to connect.The new Labor Foreign Minister Lami promised before the election: "The new government launched a review of the relationship between London and Beijing within 100 days."Because the Labor Party has been in the wild in the wild, it is impossible to receive all materials about China, especially national security, how to balance economic and national security, it is estimated that it is a problem that the Labor government continues to be able to bypass the future of the Labor government in the future.
Therefore, for the attitude of China, the West outside the United States will continue to be tangled.
The author is a bilingual writer who settled in the UK
