The Secretary -General of NATO Stoltenberg, at the ceremony of celebrating the 75th anniversary of the establishment of the organization in Brussels headquarters on April 4, the United States and Europe can ensure the safety of each other.His conversation indirectly reflects former US President Trump, which is attacked by European allies to hostile to NATO and appreciate Russian President Putin Politics Politics, and Ukraine's two major concerns on the battlefield.The Russian and Ukraine War was the main war that Europe broke out after World War II. It was regarded as a major challenge to the Western -led international peace order and the reason why NATO established.The differences in domestic politics in the United States and Western European powers have seriously hindered NATO's determination to be internal and foreign.
Although Ukraine's strategic counterattack last summer, it achieved a certain record, but as the US Congress was delayed to approve Ukraine's latest military aid, and Russia recently obtained a large number of weapons ammunition from North Korea and Iran, the Russian and Ukraine war situationIn reverse, the Ukraine was in a hard battle. In February, he was forced to abandon the Eastern Strategic Town Af Diffca due to unbearable casualties.Western analysis concerns that because the Ukrainian army had previously focused on attack and did not build a solid deep defense line on the front line, at the end of the mud period in May, the Russian army with human and weapons advantages may even achieve strategic breakthroughs during counterattacks and attack Ukraine importantly.City.
Although the new Finland and Sweden have strengthened the overall strength of NATO, more European member states have also increased national defense budgets.Inadequate, it is difficult to continue to provide a large number of artillery shells needed by Ukraine, so that NATO, which relies on the United States, cannot help the Ukraine reverse the decline.Although Stoltenberg proposes to set up a five -year fund of 100 billion euros (about S $ 146.1 billion) to help Ukraine Anti -Japanese War and reduce Trump's re -governing variables, it is still in the stage of talker on paper.At least in the short term, the United States is still the decisive factor in NATO.
French President Macron has suddenly changed his previous appeasement position since the end of February. It is recommended that he directly sent troops into Ukraine, causing great controversy.The German Prime Minister, the tough German Prime Minister, has always been strongly opposed to Russia, which has caused the internal affected to the top of the inner divergence of Germany and weaken the image of NATO unity.Russia repeatedly warned that if NATO directly sent troops to involve the Russian and Ukraine War, it would cause major consequences, including nuclear war.Observing after World War II experience, there are few direct military conflicts between the nuclear countries, and more contradictions are resolved in the form of agent war.Ukraine is currently unfortunately caught in this situation. Even if there is NATO's weapon support in hand, it is limited to not extend the front to Russia, which is evidence.In the case where it is difficult to control its own fate, it is inevitable to restore the integrity of sovereign territory.
Johnson, Speaker of the House of Representatives of the United States Congress, recently proposed to confiscate Russia's assets in the United States and help Ukraine in the form of a loan. However, in the face of the resistance of many Republican colleagues, the House of Representatives will not vote for this in the short term.At the same time, Russian overseas assets are mainly in Europe, and the US move may be a lot of money.With the military performance of Russia ’s war to the present, I am afraid that Ukraine may not be caught, let alone a determination to directly conflict with NATO with nuclear power with the world's largest military group.Therefore, similar to Polish Prime Minister Tusk asserted that Europe had entered the "pre -war era". If Ukraine was defeated by Russia, Europe would not have a safe pessimistic statement, and the composition of politics was greater than the realistic reality of the realistic territory.
Harbin conflict has made the United States more and more distracted because Israel attacked the Iranian consulate in Syrian in Syria, and the possible out -of -control accidents that China and the Philippines and the Philippines in the South China Sea.Trump has advocated acknowledging Russia to occupy the Crimean and Donbass region in exchange for peace agreements to end the war immediately.In terms of military and economic volume, Ukraine, which is insufficient and lacks foreign aid, is difficult to win from the current consumption war.Although this may not mean that NATO European members have to face Russia's direct military aggression threats in the future, for NATO, which is trying to pass the Ukraine battlefield and frustration of Moscow's territorial ambitions, it is undoubtedly a small reputation blow.
Therefore, if Ukraine is forced to accept the alliance under the city, it is a heavy blow to NATO. It is an unbearable price for Brucel, which wants to borrow NATO to get security, and Brussels, who always scares Russia as its own purpose.This result also represents that European members cannot get rid of the security dependence on the United States, and it is also that Washington does not pay enough attention to the sense of security of European allies.But NATO, especially major members such as Germany and France, still cannot effectively support Ukraine.As a maintenanceer and beneficiary of the current international order, NATO, who does not think about changing, may face unimaginable consequences.