Source: Ming Pao
Ming Pao Society Review
The reorganization of the board of directors of the Chinese University of Hong Kong has disputed."(Hereinafter referred to as the" plan "), many former and current presidents, professors, professors, and well -known people in the financial industry and the media have responded to the party.In order to respect the autonomy of the university and ensure academic freedom, the previous amendments to the university are generally proposed by the university. Although most of the contents of the amendment proposed by the school director, although most of them are similar to the reorganization plan advocated by the board of directors in 2016,Chen Delin, vice chairman of the current school board, pointed out that some key details of the draft of the practice, including the number of legal persons and transition arrangements, and discussed without the school's board of directors before the issue.Officials must respect the opinions of different universities in the university.
Draft Private Regulations on Parliament
Alumni Xianda Department's objection
The Legislative Council member Zhang Yuren, including Zhang Yuren, and three middle school directors. At the end of last month, he submitted to the Legislative Council's draft of the Private Member Regulations of the Board of Reform.The members accounted for about half, and they were changed to 23 off -school members, and the members of the school were 11, which was less than one -third, but the number of three members of the school remained unchanged.In addition, the draft has increased the threshold of the appointment of the principal and the executive vice president, and must be approved by all members of the school's board of directors, instead of continuing to adopt a simple majority system.Some Chinese and University Communities asked the Legislative Council to hold a public hearing at the incident, but it was rejected by the Act Committee.
In 2019, the anti -repair storm was deeply trapped in the CUHK. The campus was out of control. The school's handling was highly criticized.Later, Hong Kong society stabilized, the campus returned to calm, and 8 funded universities also set off.CUHK and the Mainland exchanged and cooperated, and the principal Duan Chongzhi recently led a high -level delegation to visit Beijing.Liang Meifen, chairman of the Legislative Council Act Committee, and Deng Jiabiao, who have proposed a draft private regulations, acknowledged that in recent years, Chinese university achievements and international rankings have excellent performance.There is no ability to control the crisis, "vertical students"; Zhang Yuren, a member of the proposal, also pointed out that the school govern the problem. The proposal is to "fulfill the responsibility of members and school directors."
Regarding the reorganization issue, the Director of the University of China proposed the plan as early as 2016. The general direction is to streamline the scale and reduce the number of schools.EssenceTime has changed the world. Now the legislative council ecology is completely different. Unexplained jobs should be reorganized on the agenda. The key is to advance in the direction that is beneficial to China University and Hong Kong.
According to the draft of the private regulations, the proportion of off -campus people after the reorganization of the school directors has increased significantly, and the number of management places has been greatly reduced.The university holder and alumni are worried that too late will affect university autonomy.The "plan" advocated by the selected school and alumni has obtained support for many former and current presidents of the Chinese University of China, professors, professors, and well -known people in the financial industry and the media.
The "Plan" agrees to reduce the school's board representatives, and also agrees that the Chief Executive's appointment of the school's seat will be maintained for 6 seats.The main differences between the "plan" and the draft of the private regulations include the "3 changes 2" of the members of the members of the parliament, and the threshold of the appointment of the president and executive vice president, and the voting of the two -thirds of the school.Some people in the school believe that the threshold for the appointment of draft draft is set at three quarters, which is higher than other universities in Hong Kong. The threshold is unnecessary. It may not be good for recruiting senior management personnel of outstanding universities in the future and affect the development of university.In contrast, proposal members have not explained clearly so far why they must use three -quarters as a threshold.In addition, proposal members have increased to 90 seats with the Legislative Council as the "reason" as a "reason" without reducing members of the members of the membership.Whether such logic is established is also questionable.
The joint letter pointed out that the board of directors of the Chinese University of China has never authorized Zhang Yuren, Deng Jiabiao, and Liu Guoxun to propose any draft. The draft of the three people did not submit it to the Directors of the Chinese University of China beforehand.The proposal chairman said that in mid -December last year, the "draft work draft" was submitted to the board of directors of the University of China as a consultation, and "there is no bypassing the board of directors."The "draft work draft" and a draft of the private regulations on a formal constitutional constitutional constitutional constitutional constitutional constitutional constitution are two codes. They cannot be confused.According to the data, the board of directors of the Chinese University of China indeed established a special responsibility team led by Chen Delin at the time to follow up with relevant consulting work and submitted a report in April this year.in conclusion.The proposal members claimed that the draft of the current regulations is "roughly consistent", but Chen Delin has clearly stated that the legal number and transition arrangement in the draft have not been discussed.These "unlikely" parts are the key to the current controversy.
The school's board of directors will be published in the Constitution
Council for proposal processing must be discussed
From the anti -repair storm to the storm of the school emblem last year, the governance of China University must be improved. As for how to improve it, the school's board of directors should be condensed, and then the Legislative Council will be implemented by the Repair.The current situation is serious differences in the school's board of directors. The draft private regulations proposed by the members of the members of the members of the school. Without the official review of the school's board of directors, they also published the constitution with the unknown of the school board.has a problem.The bill committee refused to hold a public hearing on the draft. One of the reasons was that the issue of the reform of the governance of the CUHK was quite political.Looking at the list of "plans", Zheng Guohan, president of Lingnan University, Xu Shichang, professor of the Central Respiratory Science and Technology, is all enthusiastic about Hong Kong, flat rationality, and respected.When they participated in the co -signs with other peaceful rational people, should the members of the society and the Legislative Council listen to their opinions and reasons seriously?
