#<<<#(writing Zhou Guangxian) On May 18, 2021, Yang Ziye, former general manager of Henan Zhongyan Industry Co., Ltd., was officially announced by officials.In June 2023, the Intermediate People's Court of Xinxiang City, Henan Province made a first trial of Yang Ziye's suspected criminal crime, and then took effect (the defendant was not appealed).Because Yang Ziye's identity is special, the content of bribery and bribery involved will directly affect the bidding of many tobacco and tobacco systems in the national tobacco system.To this end, the Discipline Inspection Commission was identified as a typical case of Yang Ziye in the report. The content of the judgment has not been made public, and it has caused widespread controversy in the tobacco system.

Public reports show that on May 18, 2021, the Henan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection issued news that Yang Ziye, a first -level inspector of the Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute, was suspected of serious disciplinary violations and was undergoing disciplinary review and supervision investigation.The resume shows that Yang Ziye, born in 1965, was born in Tancheng, Henan. He joined the job in 1987 and graduate degree.Yang Ziye had previously served as a member and deputy general manager of Henan Zhongyan Industrial Co., Ltd., and the party group of Henan Zhongyan Industrial Co., Ltd. Party Secretary and general manager.

On June 22, 2022, the website of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection released a news that Yang Ziye, the former party secretary and general manager of Henan Zhongyan Industrial Co., Ltd., was expelled from the party and public office.

According to Chiyan News, Yang Ziye's case was later approved by the Xinxiang Intermediate People's Court.In June 2023, the first instance was sentenced to ten years and six months in prison by the court.As Yang Ziye was not appealing, the judgment of the first trial took effect.

It is worth noting that after Yang Ziye was dismissed, except for the relevant notifications issued by the State Supervision Commission of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Henan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, the legal procedures for review and prosecution, trial, and public judgment of the judicial organs were not subject toPublic disclosure.According to the relevant regulations of the Ministry of Industry and Industry and Information Technology, tobacco -related enterprises (corporate legal persons and heads) suspected of bribery and bribery shall not be shortlisted for various types of bidding for tobacco systems nationwide within three years.In addition, the relevant departments also require the tobacco administrative unit of tobacco across the country to summarize the local judicial judgments of the local tobacco system each year and inform the national tobacco system.All kinds of bidding for tobacco systems in various places.After Yang Ziye's dismissal, it caused a lot of tobacco and tobacco companies in Henan Province and even the country.Yang Ziye was very special because of his identity and publicly reported publicly in the Discipline Inspection Commission. Many of his corruption was suspected of obvious duty crimes. Therefore, all sectors of society, especially tobacco, and tobacco labels were paying attention to the content of the judgment of them.

As of press time today (January 17), Chiyan News has not found the judgment result of the case on various referee documents.Subsequently, Chiyan News asked the judge of the case as an ordinary citizen, Wen Mou, a judge of the judge of the case, and the judge of the Intermediate People's Court of Xinxiang City, Henan Province. She responded that the interoperability of some judgments involved in duty crime must be approved.In other words, it is unknown when the case can be disclosed.

The meeting of the Dean of the National Senior Court of Chiyan News was held in Beijing on January 14th. At the meeting, Zhang Jun, the President of the Supreme People's Court, said that it is necessary to increase the interoperability of referee documents and deepen the disclosure of judicially, especially "having the rule of law in the rule of law.Documents leading, education, and warning should be accessing the Internet; documents in the Supreme Court and High Court should be online; the number of online documents should be maintained in a considerable scale, and various types of trial fields and various cases should be covered. "

Pictures are from the official website of the Supreme People's Court

Editor's Notes:

The official judgment of the department has become a choice question?

From January 1, 2014, the Supreme People's Court has come into effect on the provisions of the people's court on the Internet announced on the Internet.In August 2016, the provisions were revised, and Liu Xuewen, deputy full -time member of the Supreme People's Court Judgment Committee, said in an interview that the Supreme People's Court after the revised people's court announced on the Internet.For the principle, the spirit of not publicity is an exception, and the principle of disclosure of the disclosure of the referee in accordance with the law, comprehensive, timely, and standardized "is established.Except for the content that is indeed unsuitable, all the referee documents made by the People's Court should be made public on the China Magistrate Document Network, which ensures that the disclosure of the referee documents will not leave the dead ends from the public work.

In fact, the referee documents are publicly published, and there are also clearly stipulated that Article 2002 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the judgment will be announced publicly.Article 148 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the people's court will publicly declare the judgment on public trials or non -public trials.Article 80 of the Administrative Procedural Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the people's court will publicly declare the judgment on public trials and non -public trials.Since it is public sentences, participants know the results of the judgment. Of course, everyone can tell the judgment results widely and tell anyone.

But I do n’t know when it starts, the referee document work on the Internet that “openness is the principle of disclosure, and the exception” has become a choice question. Ordinary workers are on the Internet of referee documents for ordinary civil cases of labor disputes.It can be found, and a certain level of officials involved tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of criminal cases were not found on the referee documents.Which cases can be disclosed online and which cases cannot be made public on the Internet. It is necessary to look at the "careful thinking" of the court staff. The original must -have questions have become a choice question.idea.

Zhang Jun, Dean of the Supreme People's Court, has just emphasized that it is necessary to increase the access of referee documents. It can be seen that the urgency of the problem can be seen. The staff of all courts in the country can "only look at the horse" and earnestly implement the requirements of Dean Zhang Jun.The results of more senior officials involved in the case are publicly publicized to alert others to repeat the same mistakes.

Editor Li Ying Program Editor Zhao Yaqi