From the front, we expect information to promote a more harmonious and kind society, so that life has a better sense of happiness.We cherish and respect the freedom of speech, but everyone must understand that freedom of speech exists only in a responsible self -discipline environment.Therefore, I think fake information and freedom of speech are not good.

Undoubtedly, the digital age creates wealth and improve life in the digital age. The giant wheels in the digital era will always accumulate the impulse, develop new areas at a faster speed, and create unprecedented human experience.But for thousands of profits, our world inevitably becomes vague and blurred.The development of computer technology has made the deep falsification technology of artificial intelligence to almost pure fire, so that the films, videos, information and documents are confusing, and the authenticity is difficult to distinguish.Today we have witnessed and heard that some of them are true, sometimes fake.Many words and writing, seemingly quoting the scriptures, are disconnected. The same thing can be regarded as a square evidence, or it can be the reason for the anti -party statement!

On the other hand, the digital application platforms and social network media that sprung up like the rain make fake information and fake videos like a dyke, and quickly immerse them into all corners of the world, pervasiveness.This sudden and negative experience of various new phenomena, especially the damage of fake information, brings people a physiological, psychological, mental, and emotional impact, making many people feel difficult to fight or adapt.Essence

We have to face the challenges of fake videos and fake information, the main reason is that the progress of human ethics and morality does not have advanced parallel with technology.In this regard, when there is no connection between green and yellow, new digital technologies that are more and more free to make illegal people and unique people can easily convert it into an endless and changeable superpowers.Individuals, groups, or national safety are more effective and faster.

From a personal point of view, fake information may bring losses in different fields such as finance, credibility, and interpersonal relationships.From the perspective of public interests, social stability and national safety are the greatest concerns of the politicians.

Today, there are more and more personal victims.The cases of frauds used in -depth nude photos or countless tricks to ask Singapore's victims to ask for money for money are not uncommon. In 2023, Singapore recorded 46,000 scams and lost more than 650 million yuan in loss of wealth.The Strait Times has been detailed on June 29th, and it is not here to talk about it.However, when fake information damages the majority of the masses or national interests, it has to be another matter.

Asia News Network reported on June 27 that Li Xianlong's encounter.Some people use deep forgery technology to create two videos, one of which is his fictional speech on the relationship between China and the United States and the Philippines in the South China Sea at the 2022 National Day mass meeting.The viewing rate of this video is more than 146,000 times, distorting audiences to understand the potential influence of Singapore's government policy, which cannot be underestimated.The consequences that may cause disaster risk are even more worrying.

On July 29, a sensational case occurred in Sans Potter, northwest of the United Kingdom.At noon, a 17 -year -old teenager rushed into a dance party, and the children who attacked the scenes of the three girls died, and the other five children and two adults were injured.The next day, the right -wing organization spread fake information, marrying a Muslim immigrant, causing a wide range of races and religious violence, causing social turmoil.

Three people become tiger fake information to be true

The spread of information in the digital world is very different from the traditional media.Traditional media spreads a message, like a small stone dropped into the water.Ripple microwaves gradually expanded, and they gradually slightly calmed down.Moreover, ripples are limited to the water of the pond.On the network platform, the spread of information is a rapidly expanding air bubble.A person sends a fake video or information on a personal social platform. In the circle of friends, people who hold similar values, interests, religious beliefs, and interpersonal attitudes to the information will be collected.Three people became tigers, and fake information became true.The information moves from the circle of friends to another group of friends. This high index method spreads, like a bubble wine. When the bottle cap is opened, the thousands of bubbles in the blink of an eye rush out and spray on all sides.The free radiation range of digital fake information is not far away. Compared with traditional media, there is a difference between Tianyuan.According to the nature of fake information, the effect effects are different. It can control the thinking, beliefs or understanding of things.It may also play an incitement, and so on, the variables are large and endless.The generation and dissemination of fake information is concerned by everyone, and the priority is to be effectively controlled.

The most effective means to control fake information is to prevent its germination and spread.To achieve this purpose, you must use the "three swordsmen" to work together.The three swords are moral self -disciplines for citizen education, online platform operations, and targeted legal constraints.Among them, citizen education for citizenship information on online fake information is the most important and most basic approach.Only when citizen education is expected to stimulate personal moral thinking, improve the sense of social responsibility, carry forward the inherent nature of the individual, so as to restrain their emotions, hostility or desires, can they curb the sprouts of fake information.On the other hand, the knowledge and ability of educating the general public to identify information of the public, and inhibiting the habit of forwarding information in the circle of friends, can we break the spraying effect of bubbles.Therefore, successful citizen education is the root of evil.

The second way to stop fake information is to effectively handle the operating moral behavior of digital networks and media platforms.The close connection of digital networks is a key structure of information transmission speed and popularization, but its contradictions and irony are omissions and secrets of networks in determining user identity, status and position.The initials of many fake information have become invisible people and demons with masks, or increasingly common robots, making people elusive, and it is difficult to make them ride.

In order to cope with the fugitive students of citizen education, we retired and we can launch the second measure of defense to start with online suppliers.In my opinion, Internet suppliers must have measures and obligations to prevent fake information.Today, artificial intelligence's search engine function is more than enough to assist the authenticity of the information content of the information.Everyone also understands that in order to establish users' trust in protecting privacy, the Internet and social platforms refuse to look at the information content of the uploaded information. This is a legitimate management management.However, in addition to commercial profits, they cannot shirk the social responsibility and obligations they must bear, and implement the professional ethics and self -disciplines used by the Internet.In my opinion, they must provide sound pipelines that allow readers to report immediately when they discover suspicious content.In addition, online and Taiwanese businessmen must hire special training personnel to review public reporting incidents in a timely manner and take actions to prevent fake information from spreading.If the network platform cannot be self -disciplined and let the fake information such as a wild horses harm others everywhere, they cannot get rid of their suspicions that they are not malicious behaviors!

Third, government agencies can legislate processing false information.Compared with education and network self -discipline, the legal channel is a measure to treat the standard and not the root cause.However, the law has the power of binding, punishment and sanctions, and has unique importance.On June 3, 2019, Singapore formulated to prevent online fake information and network manipulation laws (POFMA) to handle false information with political purposes and harm to public interests.Once the fake information is verified, the punishment that the communicator and the network provider may face include compulsory instructions, as the content correction and termination of dissemination, or prevent visits and disable services.Those who maliciously harm the public's interests and do not follow the instruction may be sentenced to 10 years or a fine of up to 100,000 yuan.

Singapore is not the only country to legislate to control fake information. Britain also launched similar regulations in October 2023.Other countries with the legal framework of fake information include France, Germany, the European Union, the United StatesAnd Ukraine.Taking Singapore's experience as an example, a total of 66 cases have been reviewed and punished since POFMA's execution to June 30 this year.66 cases were punished within five years, and it can only be said to be the tip of the iceberg.The limitations of the law are evident.

In summary, the amount of information in front of our eyes is rapidly expanding.From the front, we expect information to promote a more harmonious and kind society, so that life has a better sense of happiness.We cherish and respect the freedom of personal speech, but everyone must understand that freedom of speech exists only in a responsible self -discipline environment.Therefore, I think fake information and freedom of speech are not good.Let's do our best, and say "no" to fake information in unison.

The author is a clinical professor