The website of the Institute of International Policy, Australia, published an article entitled by the economic governance of the country with American characteristics on November 29. The author is part -time professor of Sydney University of Science and Technology, Mark Bissen, and the senior lecturer at the University of Wellington Victoria University of Science and Technology.· Jackson.The excerpts of the article are as follows:

The United States has continuously promoted to Asia's unsuccessful regional economic agreement in China.

The latest version of the "regional economic governance strategy" in the United States is the "IPEF ) , but it is difficult for many people in the area to say the name of this initiative, moreNeedless to say, it has benefited from it.

More fundamental is that in the context of the long -term competition in the United States and China, IPEF is unlikely to change the existing development direction.China is already an economic participant in the region, and it is also the main economic partner of all neighboring countries.

Those who are keen on the confrontation of the country often ignore a little bit, that is, for decades after the Asian financial crisis from 1997 to 1998, the Asian government has established a enhanced economic interdependence.And basically exclude the United States' financial and economic structures.The Chiang Mai initiative of currency exchange in the region, the "Asian Bond Market Initiative", "10+3" (ASEAN+China and South Korea ), "ASEAN Supervisor", "Northeast Asian three -sided cooperationThe Secretariat "and the Asian and European conference are only a few agreements to constitute the Asian economic order.

China is the parties of most of the agreements; the United States has not participated in any of the agreements.This list does not include many agreements that connect the area together in China, such as the "Belt and Road" initiative and the regional comprehensive economic partnership agreement (RCEP) -ton the agreement does not include the United States, but the United States is inAll key allies in this area.

U.S. decision makers may be able to learn something from the practice of China, although this may be unhappy and the possibility is not much.

The useful lesson is that the United States no longer controls Asia's political economy.Promoting the trade agreement does not have any effects except for the constraints of American scientific and technological oligarchs from the constraints of laws and regulations of Asian countries. This will not restore the dominant position of the United States and will not offset China's influence.美国提出的“重建更好世界”计划是对中国宏大的“一带一路”倡议的苍白模仿。

The successful economic governance strategy depends on the key concerns of solving potential partners: poverty alleviation, sustainable economic growth transformation, and useful infrastructure and investment.

Facts may prove that it is difficult for American foreign policy makers to surpass the content that people are too familiar, that is, to curb and zero and competition with its main opponents.

值得记住的是,亚洲的长期和平很大程度上归功于美国和中国之间合作共存的发展。Economic interdependence may still be a force that promotes more stable relations between major powers, and it is likely to be welcomed throughout the Pacific region.(Compilation/Wang Haiyu)