Liu Jincai
The Kuomintang Honorary Chairman Lien Chan was invited by the leader of the General Secretary of the Communist Party of China and visited mainland China. & Ldquo; Xi Lianhui & rdquo; Shi Shi side proposed & ldquo;The meeting with the Chinese leaders in this Lien Chan was once again in a vicious circle of cross -strait relations, which is very similar to the background of the CPC General Secretary Hu Jintao, Hu Jintao, the General Secretary of the Communist Party of China, Hu Jintao.Therefore, & ldquo; Xi Lianhui Fourth Fourth Department & RDQUO; Whether it is like & ldquo; Lianhu Club & rdquo; to reach & ldquo; five major peace vision & rdquo; have great attention.
Lien Chan put forward & ldquo; four points of opinion & rdquo; first reiterated & ldquo; a China & rdquo;, the same principles of the middle of the meaning of the meaning of the meaning of the meaning of the meaning of the meaning of the cross -straitPeace, the two sides & ldquo; seek happiness for the people, open the peace & rdquo; three, mutually beneficial integration, co -integrated & ldquo; exchanges and cooperation and mutual benefit, enhance cross -strait integration & rdquo;National & rdquo;.
Chinese leaders throwing & ldquo; Four new Xi & rdquo;, with soft demands as the starting point, to promote & ldquo; cross -strait integration, peaceful unity & rdquo; reiterate & ldquo; oppose Taiwan independence & rdquo;Communication, well -being of compatriots, and national rejuvenation, try to use soft demands as much as possible, and to attack the hearts of the people of Taiwan.
First of all, reiterate & ldquo; a China & rdquo; architecture, identity & ldquo; 1992 consensus & rdquo;, the same belonging to the Chinese nation, continuing the consensus of the country and the Communist Party.Lien Chan reiterated & ldquo; a Chinese & rdquo; architecture, pointing out that the two sides of the strait & ldquo; there should be no space for Taiwan independence & rdquo;, the two sides of the strait can be completely through & ldquo; & ldquo; 1992 consensus & rdquo; Believe each other and restart the dialogue.He emphasized that the people of cross -strait peoples & ldquo; the same belonging to the Chinese nation & rdquo;, have the same blood, culture, and history. They are both Taiwanese and Chinese. They are two sides of the strait & rdquo; response & ldquo;Printing the common blood, culture, history & rdquo;, Taiwan has not changed to adhere to the Chinese culture and national position, & ldquo; to be a stand -up Taiwanese and a positive Chinese.; National identity is a peaceful foundation for cross -strait.
Secondly, the policy of Taiwan's policy bypassed the Tsai Ing -wen authorities and continued to marginalize the Democratic Progressive Party on both sides of the strait.Chinese leaders have proposed that compatriots on both sides of the strait have never been separated in national, cultural identity and emotion. & Ldquo; compatriots on both sides of the strait have a consistent longing for cross -strait relations, and anyone cannot stop & rdquo; and & ldquo.Different views should not be the excuse to obstruct the exchanges and cooperation between cross -strait exchanges and cooperation & rdquo; hope that compatriots on both sides of the strait will compare their hearts, enhance their understanding, and realize their minds; emphasize that & ldquo; On the road of the Chinese nation's rejuvenation, Taiwanese compatriots should not be absent and will not be absent.& rdquo;
The mainland's policy on Taiwan has proposed & ldquo; hopes to be in the Taiwan authorities, and even hope to separate the relationship between the Taiwan authorities and the people of Taiwan.The Chinese leader used & ldquo; Taiwan compatriots & rdquo; and & ldquo; compatriots on both sides of the strait & rdquo; emphasized national cultural identity, exchanges and cooperation, and national rejuvenation.At the same time, I no longer say clearly & ldquo; as long as they agree with & lsquo; 1992 consensus & rsquo;, no political parties and mainland exchanges have no obstacles & rdquo; waiting for the political statements of the DPP authorities, the mainland's policy of Taiwan's policy has gained Cai Yingwen and continued marginalization.The Democratic Progressive Party government directly uses the people of Taiwan as a group of policies.
Furthermore, show the subjectivity and dominance of the Kuomintang Cross -Strait.Lien Zhan not only shows the autonomous pattern of the Kuomintang's cross -strait policy, including the topic & rdquo; upper & ldquo; see the same, the difference between the meaning of the meaning of the principle & rdquo;The vision of peace on both sides of the strait, although it has not been mentioned in the four -point proposal to terminate the hostile state and cross -strait peace agreements, which is in line with the spirit of the Kuomintang's new revision of the political platform.However, in the preface, the five vision of the Huilianlian is connected; emphasizing exchanges and cooperation, and re -continuing the three stages of the national unified program: mutual exchange, mutual trust cooperation, negotiating unity; promote the development of civil rights and people's livelihoodism, and meet the establishment of the National Unified Program.Liberty and democracy have a unified goal, showing the orthodox of the Kuomintang's grasp of Sun Yat -sen's thoughts and the Three People's Principles.At the same time, in the process of revitalizing the nation, the dignity and rights of the people of Taiwan should be improved, which is also in line with the unified opportunity and method mentioned by the National Unification program.
From the integration of the agency to the political integration
In the end, cross -strait relations & ldquo; a Chinese architecture & rdquo; from the agent to political integration.First, Lien Chan responded positively & ldquo; A China & rdquo;, proposed that the laws and systems on both sides of the strait were implemented & ldquo; a Chinese architecture & rdquo; cross -strait relations are not national and state relations, and there should be no space for Taiwan.Second, adhere to the peaceful development of both sides of the strait, first use & ldquo; & ldquo; 1992 consensus & rdquo; consolidate political mutual trust, restart dialogue, resolve the obstacles of international participation in Taiwan, and then conduct comprehensive negotiations in all directions.Political differences.Third, echo the integration of cross -strait integration. This is mentioned by Xi after the stage of Xi.Lien Chan echoed the great rejuvenation of the nation mentioned in the Xi Institute and the country's unity. In this process, the dignity and rights of the people of Taiwan should be improved to highlight the Hongwei pattern and significance of & ldquo; to revitalize China & rdquo;
In 2005 & ldquo; Hu Lianhui & rdquo; reached five vision of peace, laid the era of cross -strait cooperation, the era of great exchange of cross -strait in 2008, and the establishment of a peaceful and stable relationship structure.2018 & ldquo; Xi Lianhui & rdquo; mentioned & ldquo; four points of suggestion & rdquo;, may produce the historical significance of & ldquo; even Huhui & rdquo;, laid the cornerstone of Taiwan ’s rotation again.
& ldquo; Xi Lianhui & rdquo; have the political demonstration effect of & ldquo; Xiangzhuang dance sword, intending Pei Gong & rdquo;, & ldquo; Cai Xi Club & rdquo; 92 consensus & rdquo; political foundation; at the same time, a Chinese framework Structure, identity& ldquo; 1992 Consensus & rdquo;, opposes Taiwan independence, cross -strait non -country and state relations, cross -strait integration, the same belonging to the Chinese nation, and revitalizing China. It will become a common conceptual word combination of the two -strait policy exposition of the KMT and the Communist Party of China, & ldquo;If the DPP authorities have repeatedly refused to recognize & ldquo; 1992 Consensus & RDQUO; and denying that the two sides of the strait belong to the Chinese nation, it is destined to not be able to escape the role of repeated marginalization in cross -strait relations.
The author is Taiwan Foguang University
Assistant professor of the Department of Public Affairs
