Recently, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences released the "Leisure Green Paper: 2017-2018 China Leisure Development Report". It is recommended to implement & ldquo;A total of 36 hours of working system.It is also said that by then, the state can cancel the Golden Week or small holiday system that is formed after being borrowed every year; employees can negotiate with the unit according to their own needs to flexibly arrange their holidays.
The starting point of the green paper is undoubtedly good. It is intended to allow the workers to get more leisure time and more flexibly arrange their lives outside their work.However, when overtime culture is popular, & ldquo; 996 & rdquo; becomes normal, companies and units & ldquo; internal regulations & rdquo; This vision becomes a vision, and this suggestion has little real significance.
In the actual context, & ldquo; do the four breaks and three & rdquo; there is actually a kind of embarrassment that is not available.According to CCTV, the National Bureau of Statistics, etc. launched & ldquo; the results of the Chinese economic life survey & rdquo; except for work and sleep, the average daily leisure time of Chinese people in 2017 was 2.27 hours, which was reduced from 2.55 hours three years ago.It is only one -half of developed countries such as Britain and the United States.This reflects the two trends: First, the overall burden of Chinese national work is still increasing; second, the social and economic development can be reduced to a certain degree.
The problem is this contradiction: the burden of work is still increasing, leisure time is still in the stage of compression. It is simply that the working hours are reduced from 40 hours a week to 36 hours.For the time being, many companies cannot accept it, and some employees may not accept themselves: they also expect to make a two -day class and earn a little more performance salary.
Another uncertain factor is that it is recommended to be fulfilled in 2030.In the twelve years, this is too long for this high -speed society, and no one can imagine what the working environment and labor model will be like after twelve years.How is artificial intelligence develop?To what level of technology progress?How many types of work update iterations?Some netizens joked that & ldquo; Whether to keep the existing work is not sure & rdquo;, when this worry encounters & ldquo; take a few days a week & rdquo;, the latter is not a problem.
From another perspective, after 12 years of redemption, this also reflects that some researchers have no power to effectively implement the current overtime, rest rights and paid leave.Self -regulation and objective progress of society during the year.However, the pragmatic approach is that it can only be that the existing rights of the paper first ensure that the rights of the paper are well guaranteed, the existing system is well maintained, implemented in place, and then desires to go further.
In addition, once this proposal is not in advance, it is likely to cause new problems, such as the gap between the rich and the poor & rdquo;Some industries or positions that were originally relatively leisure will be more people floating; and even the industry or positions that cannot be guaranteed normally by & ldquo; to do five breaks and two hours.Three & rdquo;.In this way, & ldquo; I just evolved into some people's envy and jealousy for another person.
Of course, maybe after a few years, the efficiency of labor has been greatly improved. The technology has filled many reality bugs, and the rest rights have been fully valued. The dream of & ldquo; can be realized by four breaks and three & rdquo;But everything goes back to a reality premise: only the land under the feet is solid enough, and talents can take the step.
& nbsp;
Source: Surging News
Author: and Gui
