Hong Kong officially announced that more than 13,000 comments were received during the 23rd public consultation period of the Basic Law, of which more than 10 of them were opposed suggestions from overseas anti -China organizations or absconding foreigners.
Hong Kong officials announced the above numbers after the public consultation on Wednesday (February 28).According to the content published by the Hong Kong Government News Communist News Website on Thursday (29th), the number of opinions received in the end it takes some time, but as of 11:59 pm on the 28th, the SAR Government received a total ofBy 13147 opinions.
A spokesman for the Security Bureau said: "Among them, 12,969 support and positive opinions (accounting for 98.64%); another 85 opinions are simply raising questions, or the opinions of expression cannot reflect it.Positions (accounting for 0.65%); 93 are opposed (0.71%of the total, more than 10 of which are from overseas anti -China organizations or absconding foreign people).The SAR Government will integrate the results of the consultation at full speed and report it to the joint meeting of the Security Affairs Committee of the Legislative Council and the Judicial and Legal Affairs Committee.Essence
The official also said that during the legislative process, the SAR government will continue to actively explain to people from all walks of life, and take the initiative to distribute more information related to legislation through different channels.Unreasonable attacks and discreditation, in order to face up to the people, avoid misleading citizens.Develop and maintain prosperity and stability. "
At the end of the public consultation, official consultation between Britain and the United States criticized Article 23 of the Basic Law.British Foreign Minister Cameron on Wednesday (28th) refers to Article 23 of the Hong Kong Basic Law. The legislative proposal has not fulfilled the obligation to Hong Kong under the joint statement of Sino -British.
The US State Council spokesman Miller said in a press release issued by the State Council's official website on the 28th: "We pay special attention to the official proposal of Hong Kong officials to use a broad and blurred definition of 'national secret' and 'external interference' 'These definitions may be used to be used by fear of being arrested and detained to eliminate abnormalities.The Chinese Constitution and the Basic Law of Hong Kong, not a joint statement in China and Britain.Britain has no sovereignty, no right to govern Hong Kong, and has no supervision.
A spokesperson for the Hong Kong Office of the Hong Kong State Administration said: "Individual politicians and the media in the United Kingdom and other countries adhere to the prejudice against China, and believe that the country involves the wide range of legal coverage in national security, the strict and righteousness of regulations, but obsessed with obsessionIn the use of the "gray filter" to interpret Article 23 of the Basic Law, it will deliberately confront the national security and rights to slander the slander of the injury in the name of submitting opinions.
