On the afternoon of November 10, the notice of the verification results of the previous online circulation, the applied performer stated exclusively to the prism authors that the court sent him apology information, saying that the previous content expression was wrong and corrected.
"The content of the verification results sent by the court on November 7, 2023 was wrong, and now it is correct, and the notice of the verification results after the corrected verification is given to you today.Apologically apologize, please destroy the wrong documents delivered by the Japanese Academy on November 7th.
In the afternoon of the same day, the People's Court of Shenzhen Luohu District also officially responded on the official Weibo. The court said that the previous verification results notice was incorrect, and it had been corrected and apologized to the parties.In the next step, the relevant responsible person will be dealt with seriously.
The notice of the verification results after the correction of whether there is a property available for execution states: "During the execution process, the court has verified the property under the name of the person in accordance with the law., The national court's network execution and control system has verified the bank deposits, stocks, industry and commerce equity, real estate, real estate, vehicles, Internet bank account balances, etc.
The notice of the verification results of the previous edition of November 7 stated: "After investigation with relevant departments such as banks, land, industry and commerce, securities, vehicle management and other departments, it was not found that the executed person had available property. Therefore, in this case, this caseThe executed person has no property for punishment. "
For the measures taken, the notification of the verification results after the correction stated: "The court issued a restricted consumption order to the executed person in accordance with the law, and included it in the list of the person who was dishonest."
The previous verification results notice stated: "Because the current whereabouts are unknown, the court cannot effectively notify the subject to the hospital for investigation.In the reporting system, the court intends to decide to be detained (or the legal person, the person in charge).
In comparison, the notice of the verification results of the Shenzhen Luohu District Court on November 10 deletes "the current whereabouts are unknown", "Detoxical detention of the decision (or legal person, the main person in charge)" and so onExplanation.
According to the applied executive to the prism author, on November 10, since the press fermentation of Yao Zhenhua, Baoneng has not contacted him, nor did he discuss the issue of paying salary.
