Zhu Lilun: It is the people of Taiwan who can not be split in half of the blue and whi

In response to Taiwan's wild blue and white, the Kuomintang chairman Zhu Lilun described that "the current situation is that the Bible is like a prisoner, but the child who is split in half is the people of Taiwan."He also emphasized that he would not give up cooperation in less than one second or even half a second.

Comprehensive Taiwan Wind Media and Central News Agency reported that Zhu Lilun accompanied the seven blue camps of the blue camp of the blue camp on Tuesday (November 21) with Taichung Mayor Lu Xiuyan to register for the election.

Zhu Lilun said in an interview with the media that Lan Baihe is the mainstream public opinion of Taiwan, and it is a very important milestone for democratic reform.In despair, you will never give up cooperation. "

He said that in the past few days, Ke Wenzhe, the presidential candidate of the people, bears tremendous pressure from family and staff, but cannot be forgotten. The most important thing is the people of Taiwan."The current situation is that the Bible says like a prisoner, but the children who have been split into half are the people of Taiwan."

Zhu Lilun calls on those who are the main war and advocate to fight to the end.The party rebounded, and the Kuomintang supporters couldn't stand it.This is a very important milestone for Taiwan's democratic reform. As long as one reason is to be achieved, you can find 100 reasons for breaking the situation.

He emphasized that during the process of blue and white he was humiliated, he could bear the burden of humiliation. As long as he had the people in his heart, let alone let go of himself, as long as he was a little smaller, everything would be done.

The deputy president of Taiwan will be registered on Friday (November 24). The blue and white parties must decide whether to cooperate before this to jointly launch a group of candidates.As of now, although the Blue and Bai parties have emphasized that they must cooperate, the differences between the two sides have stagnated the differences in the cognition of poll data and the scope of errors.