The US World Political Review Website published on May 24, entitled that the response to Biden's response to the International Criminal Court weakened its own foreign policy.Paul Poster.Article excerpts as follows:

The Gaza War will not change world order, but it has completely destroyed the concepts of "rules -based order".On the 20th, the International Criminal Court took a bold step, announcing that the court judges issued an arrest warrant against Israeli Prime Minister Neitanahu and the National Defense Minister Garant.At the same time, the court announced that it also sought an arrest warrant for Hamas leaders.

At first glance, this seems to be the victory of "rules -based order".But some people criticize this decision, and this is where the "rules -based order" performs poorly.

The most noteworthy is the US response.People may originally expect that the Bayeng government issued at least one carefully statement to express the "serious concerns" of the relevant ruling, calling on all the actors to ensure that their actions are in line with humanitarian regulations, and then they must declare that the fastest solution in crisis is the fastest solution to the crisis.It was not through the court, but the ceasefire was reached.

But this did not happen.On the contrary, US Secretary of State Broskel issued a statement saying that the behavior of the International Criminal Court was "shameful."Biden made a severe response as Brinton, saying that the arrest order was "appalling."He went on to say, "No matter what the prosecutor hints, there is no equivalent between Israel and Hamas." The Bayeng government even considered sanctions on officials of the International Criminal Court.

Bynden and Brinken's severe response existing a more basic problem: they destroyed the core pillar of Biden Blinken Foreign Policy AD, that is, the United States is the guardian of "rules-based order".

Although the International Criminal Court is a newer part of the order, it was established in 1998 through the Roman Statue, but it was regarded by many countries as the core component of "rules -based order".Although the United States is not a Roman State's contract, the Bayeng administration has expressed support for the international criminal court's ruling on other occasions.

Now, Biden and Brinken have blatantly refuted the International Criminal Court's allegations on Israel's leadership, which exposes the hypocrisy of power politics: if the international criminal court's ruling is aimed at opponents, it is great.EssenceThese rules can be in charge of you, but you can't control me.

The fact is that the United States has a twists and turns in compliance with the various rules of "rules -based order".But before that, the Bayeng government tried to show at least how to work in this order and often praised its advantages.Biden and Brinken have actually weakened their efforts in the past three years.After the Trump administration's neglect and dismissive of international institutions for many years, the Bayeng government has been reshaping the influence of international institutions in the past three years.

For people like Biden's practical politics, his response is particularly surprising.If a "rule -based order" is the most firm supporter of the most firm support for the rule of actual use of this order, it is to give up this "game".Even if they do not respect the norms and the law itself, Biden's subconscious response to the International Criminal Court on Nitaniah's ruling will destroy its broader strategic goals.International law can become a tool for strong men or the protection of the weak, and Biden just used this tool.(Compiled/Zhu Jie)