Iranian President Laich and Foreign Minister Abdullahiyan were killed in the helicopter accident, which shocked the world.Is it an accident or a conspiracy analysis and guess, and it is estimated that it will continue for a long time.
Talking about these two senior officials in Iran, there are two things to mention.First, within their tenure, the improvement of bilateral relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia historically, the two countries resumed diplomatic relations, mutual ambassadors, and discussed specific measures to strengthen bilateral relations.The rapid recovery of the two strong relationships in the Gulf not only triggers Qatar and Barin, Tunisia and Syria, Qatar and the UAE, Egypt and Turkey, as well as the Maldives, Sudan and Iran.The qualifications of the Angeles Agreement to restore Syria's interruption for 12 years.Syrian President Assad has also visited Saudi Arabia for the first time since the Syrian crisis broke out in 2011. It has first participated in the Arab League summit and spoke, which promoted the ease of the Middle East situation.
The second is that after the outbreak of the Harbin conflict last year, the relationship between Iran and Israel is becoming more dangerous.But last month, in the face of Israel's missile attack on the Iranian embassy consular department in the Syrian embassy, although Iran retaliated with Israel's target with missiles and drones, the scale was relatively restrained and did not cause a greater crisis.On the day of the helicopter accident, Laich was going to the Alaz River in the border area of Iran and Azerbaijan to meet with Azerbaijan President Ariyev and participated in the production and production ceremony of a hydropower station jointly constructed by the two countries.The spare no effort in the dispute between Armenia.
This is not to say that Laich is a pigeon in internal and external policies.In fact, Laish not only rely on his own tough colors of his hawks. In the years he served as the president, Iran and Western countries continued to each other, and the strategy of "seeing the east" strategy further strengthened the relationship with Russia and other countries.In the continuous chaos in the Middle East, compete for regional dominance.
But it is also worth noting that in the past three years, Iran's internal and external policies have been hard and soft, and there are neither excessive measures nor gave radical remarks.Laish pursued the "resistance of diplomacy" that contempt for Western powers, but held an open attitude towards negotiations.He is opposite to the United States, but he continues to negotiate with the United States.In the Middle East and international disputes, although there are no shortage of hard bar resistance, he also maintains timely communication with relevant parties to resolve contradictions and ease risks, and can also make a certain degree of concessions.Since the outbreak of the Harbin conflict last year, the communication and coordination of Laci, Abdullahiyan and Lebanon Allah, etc., can not be said to have no effect on avoiding exacerbating the tension in the Middle East.It can be said that the compromise is another color that should not be ignored.
The problem now is that after Laish and Abdullahiyan, as the core figures of Iranian diplomatic figures, how much the successor can maintain their open attitude towards negotiations, do not spread the excessive policies and discourse, and also, and the excessive policies and discourse, and alsoCan be able to exchange for the necessary compromise between national relations with a "certain degree of concessions" to resolve the Middle East chaos, and to let the world break away from war?
Covering the coffin conclusion, it is said that a person can only make conclusions after death.After Laish and Foreign Ministers were killed, the international community, including Western public opinion, held a positive attitude towards the Laich government's "certain degree of concessions", indicating that the compromise between the contradictions in international relations was the result of mutual understanding of the parties for mutual forgiveness and mutual concession and mutual concession to each other.It reflects the vision of the international community.
For the chaotic world today, the international order and the way of getting along with the country, in addition to the hard -to -carry of a decisive victory and defeat, the necessary compromise and peaceful relationship between the common interests, I am afraid that it is even moreIt can reflect human conscience and the character of politicians, and it will also win praise from most people.Therefore, taking a step back in the sea wide sky is obviously the prerequisite for the sea wide sky.
Furthermore, each country has its own concerns and its own interests that must be maintained, but this does not prevent the understanding or respect of other countries' concerns and interests.British critic and writer John Morley emphasized in the discussion compromise that it is not the same as tolerance.In his opinion, not compromise is just not sacrificing his principles and persistence, but it does not mean to force others to make such sacrifices.
Obviously, when the connotation of compromise and understanding and respect is superimposed, the compromise is not only a kind of actual need, but also the international organization, international organizations, countries and countries, and even people.Character, mind, and wisdom: compromise is difficult, and it is still necessary to compromise when you should compromise; even if it is difficult to achieve, at least there must be mutual understanding and respect.If you do n’t want to, do n’t do it, do n’t see each other at every turn, so that power and killing will become a conversion of relations between the country.
Human civilization has come to this day. It is not difficult to understand the significance of compromise with world peace and human harmony.Even though some of the short -term contradictions and disputes that are difficult to compromise in the world today, the parties only need to recognize compromise, have a compromise, and take compromise paths. There are always ways.For example, you can talk slowly first, try to find each other's common points; for example, you can put the dispute first, and cooperate with no controversial issues, all of which are ideas.Even if it is always unreasonable in the messy controversy, time can be relieved.It is definitely better to give the problem to time than to be handed over to conflict, war, and even nuclear wars.
Reason, to transform the shock and anxiety of Laish's death into the efforts of seeking same -deposit differences and casting swords as plows, so that compromise can continue, with a "step back", bring the situation of "sea wide sky" in the world today.It should be the vision of condensing from Laish's misfortune.
This may be the day after Laish's death, the United Nations Security Council's representatives with different positions with different stances, together for a minute of silence for Lechi and others.
The author is a professor at the School of Administration of Shanxi
