Source: Surging News
Author: Shen Bin
How did the investigation of the "Arctic Catfish" progressed?In March of this year, netizens "Arctic Catfish" released a series of extreme remarks such as "9 digits in the family", "feel greedy", "Run" to Australia, which aroused public opinion.The grandfather and retired cadre of "Arctic Catfish" were conducted inspections.
Some netizens applied for government information disclosure to the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau on the investigation of the case.At present, the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau said in a response letter on September 6: "The public information you apply is not the information produced or obtained in the process of performing administrative management functions, and it does not belong to the disclosure of government information disclosure of the People's Republic of China.The government information referred to in Article 2 of the Regulations ... Our bureau decides not to be disclosed. "
Many netizens questioned this: After the investigation, it was to tell everyone that "not to be disclosed"?Is the entire incident going bad?
I want to see that according to the government information disclosure regulations, it is not public, I am afraid it is not what everyone thinks of "will never be disclosed in the future".Because government information disclosure regulations, as an administrative regulations promulgated by the State Council, are quite strict in the definition of "government information".According to the provisions of Article 2 of the Regulations, the government information referred to in these regulations refers to the information produced or obtained by the administrative organ in the process of fulfilling the administrative management function.
In other words, government information applied for disclosure of citizens in accordance with the government information disclosure regulations refers to the information formed by the administrative agency in "Performing Administrative Management Functions".In this regard, the disciplinary investigation and integrity investigation of relevant officials (including retired officials) within the government (including retired officials) do not belong to the content of "performance of administrative management" in the narrow sense, and it is not a "government information" that can be made public.
Therefore, at the "technology" level, the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau replied to "not open".However, this "non -disclosure" does not mean that they are "not disclosed", and they are not disclosed as "government information" in a narrow sense, and it does not mean that it cannot publicly investigate the conclusion of the retired cadre Zhong Moumou.In the era of comprehensively advancing the rule of law, government information disclosure should be handled according to law; at the same time, insisting on anti -corruption, there is no restricted area, full coverage, and zero tolerance, and we cannot avoid normal supervision with the "government information" in a narrow sense.
As early as March 24 this year, the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau stated that "it has been verified on relevant information and will be notified in a timely manner."This is a solemn commitment made by all members of the society: it will investigate the facts clearly and will explain to the public.This is also the responsibility and political responsibility of discipline inspection and supervision that must be fulfilled.
The "Arctic Catfish" incident had a bad impact. A young girl publicly disclosed that the relatives of the district traffic bureau's relatives were suspected of serious corruption, and they were used to insult the masses with "leek".In any case, there must be a comprehensive investigation.
The Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau announced a verification of this. It has been in the past six months. There are media contacting relevant departments in June, July, and August of this year, but they have not obtained the progress of the disclosure case.This was only on August 23 that netizens applied for government information disclosure to the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau.
The investigation takes a certain time. It is understandable that the investigation should be responsible for the reputation of party members and cadres, and also responsible for the right to the truth and the public, but a strict investigation cannot be "broken"."Government information disclosure" in the narrow sense does not apply to the internal investigation of officials.However, disclosure is the best preservative. The information of the "Arctic Catfish" case is not only an open commitment of government departments, but also a link that should be in the anti -corruption investigation.Everyone is waiting for authoritative information disclosure.
