What is the investigation of the Arctic Catfish Case?In March of this year, netizens' Arctic Catfish released a series of extreme remarks such as 9 digits, family members felt greedy, and moistened to Australia, which caused public attention. At that time, the Shenzhen Transportation Bureau announced thatZhong Moumou conducted a verification.
Some netizens applied for government information disclosure to the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau on the investigation of the case.At present, the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau said in a reply letter on September 6: The public information you apply is not the information produced or obtained by our bureau in the process of fulfilling the administrative management function.Article 2 The government information hellip; hellip; Our bureau decides not to be disclosed.
Many netizens questioned this: After the investigation for 6 months, is it to tell everyone not to be disclosed?Is the entire incident going bad?
To see that the government information disclosure regulations will not be disclosed, I am afraid that everyone will never be disclosed in the future.Because government information disclosure regulations, as an administrative regulations promulgated by the State Council, are quite strict in the definition of government information.According to the provisions of Article 2 of the Regulations, the government information referred to in these regulations refers to the information produced or obtained by the administrative organ in the process of fulfilling the administrative management function.
In other words, government information applied for disclosure of citizens in accordance with government information disclosure regulations refers to information formed by administrative agencies in performing administrative management functions.In this regard, the disciplinary investigation and integrity investigation of relevant officials (including retired officials) within the government (including retired officials) do not belong to the content of administrative management in the narrow sense, and it does not belong to government information that can apply for disclosure.
Therefore, at the technical level, the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau responded that there was no problem.However, it does not mean that the disclosure does not mean that they will be disclosed, and the disclosure of government information in the narrow sense does not mean that it cannot publicly investigate the conclusion of the retired cadre Zhong Moumou.In the era of comprehensively promoting the rule of law according to law, government information disclosure should be handled according to law; at the same time, insisting on anti -corruption, there is no restricted area, full coverage, and zero tolerance, and we cannot avoid normal supervision with the narrow government information.
As early as March 24 this year, the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau stated that it had verified the relevant information and will notify the relevant situation in a timely manner.This is a solemn commitment made by all members of the society: it will investigate the facts clearly and will explain to the public.This is also the responsibility and political responsibility of discipline inspection and supervision that must be fulfilled.
The Arctic Catfish incident had a bad impact. A young girl publicly disclosed that the relatives of the district traffic bureau's relatives were suspected of serious corruption and used leek to insult the masses. Not only did it show off their wealth, but they were also suspected of insulting the country.In any case, there must be a comprehensive investigation.
The Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau announced a verification of this. It has been in the past six months. The media have contacted relevant departments in June, July, and August this year, but they did not get the progress of the case.This was only on August 23 that netizens applied for government information disclosure to the Shenzhen Municipal Transportation Bureau.
The survey takes a certain time. It is understandable that the investigation must be responsible for the reputation of party members and cadres, and also responsible for the right to know the truth and the public, but a rigorous investigation cannot be broken.The disclosure of government information in the narrow sense does not apply to the internal investigation of officials.However, disclosure is the best preservatives. The disclosure of the information of the Arctic catfish case is not only an open commitment of government departments, but also a link between anti -corruption investigation.Everyone is waiting for authoritative information disclosure.
