French President Macron probably did not live well a while ago. He raised the legal retirement age from 62 to 64 years old.Although it is only two years of raising for two years, it is only a time in which the fiscal collapse is delayed, and the fundamental problem of pension is not really solved.Large -scale protests, compared with the yellow vest incident a few years ago, are even better.
As we all know, French social benefits are well -known, and trade union organizations are also very powerful. From time to time, strike or more intense means to fight for benefits for workers.As early as the end of World War II, the "National Resistance Commission", which mainly coordinated the national resistance invaders during the war, has introduced the pension system to ensure that when the workers and their families cannot continue their work, they can still provide sufficient economic support by the state to satisfy the state and satisfy the state to satisfy the state and satisfy the state and satisfy the state and satisfy the state.Material life in his later years.This is also a system of proud of the French people who support the party. After all, the French pension mechanism is very enviable than other European countries.
But the huge pension is costly. At the rapid development of the economy, the proportion of the number of infant tide in the post -war of the labor population was the highest. In the 1960s, the average 67 working population burden a retirement population.However, with the improvement of medical care, the life expectancy has been greatly extended, and the changes in young childization and family concepts. By the 1990s, this proportion slowly became a retirement person who had gradually become two or three working people.In 2000, it is no longer a news in the face of aging society. In Europe, it is the most developed in Western European countries with the highest degree of development.For a person who is not working on average, he may have to raise more than one retired citizen. If the state's tax and expenditure cannot be balanced, the fiscal collapse is inevitable.
What should I do?Democratic constitutional leadership is usually intellectuals and elite classes. They definitely know the seriousness of the problem than the people.It is necessary to avoid the crisis of the pension bankruptcy and not to move towards communism. Before the solution that has been found once and for all, it can only continue to "delay the problem" -To delay in retirement, trying to let more people share the retirement population, let the session let the sessions allowThose who retire can not come so much at one time, to some extent slowing down the pressure of paying pensions.But everyone can see that this is just a procrastination technique. If it is compared with the state's finances into severe patients, doing so is like constantly injection of Qiangxin Needle, rather than really finding and removing the lesion.
In fact, not only France, but countries have faced similar dilemma one after another, and they all want to delay the years of applying for retirement pensions. Even Russia was in 2018 by Prime Minister Medvedev.At this time, the reform of the retirement system was suddenly announced. It is planned to increase the retirement age from 60 to 65 by 2028. This naturally also caused a considerable rebound in Russia. Putin's support has fallen from the usual 80 % to 60 % to 60 %Many, let him rarely make concessions immediately.But no matter how shabby Russia is, there is a huge income of petroleum and natural gas. It can be used as a pension subsidy. When most French and European economic powers are gradually losing their international advantages, where should they go?The open source seems to be difficult, so it can only start with the throbbing.
Pension is naturally a good thing. Contemporary democratic politics pursues different degrees of welfare national policies and take care of the country's and civil TV as one of the important responsibilities of the government.Letting the public live in the old age with dignity, France has done a good job in this regard. Many media even evaluate the French government's pension system as the "cross -generation unity" and bring stability and development to society. Therefore,Even though the French national strength is not as good as before, the fiscal deficit is serious year by year, but the successor leaders do not dare to make adjustments easily, let alone reform.After all, whoever moves the interests of the majority of workers may be criticized as an eternal sinner who disrupts generations of unity. Any government that needs to please voters knows what will be the end of this.
Ke Macron wants to shape its historical status. Even if domestic people strongly oppose, most of the 577 parliamentarians do not support it. Even if they know that they must not be forced, he is still given by the special power given through the Constitution.The constitutional committee of the Congress directly handed over to the nine members and passed the bill on April 14 (Friday).He himself signed a bill in the early morning of Saturday in less than 24 hours to officially set the extension of the retirement age as a law.This is what he wants to promote in the first term, and after all, he can do it in a very thrilling way.This retirement reform bill, which is required to be evaluated by future generations, has "temporarily" saved the pension budget for the dangerous pension.
Let the four seas, such decisions are undoubtedly correct. Maybe after many years, the public can see how important it is to do so for the country's long -term security.Solve the difficult situation faced by population, taxation and finance.But at this moment, Macron will face Congress to vote for his unbelievable voting, intensify national resistance and riot, and pay high political costs.
In any case, the glory of France's history will probably not come back again. France may eventually gradually fade away from the beauty of socialism and replace it.Can maintain basic dignity of survival.Volkswagen must be psychologically prepared, and the government's benefits may be forced to recover.
The author is the United Nations Advisor of the Information Technology Department
