Social editorial: ＂Exemption skirt＂ becomes ＂explosion＂, and the platform respo

Source: Xinjing News Agency

"Hu Mouyong held the door incident" is still fermenting, and from the perspective of online public opinion in China, it seems to be walking in a more absurd and weird direction.

After the parties were investigated, they did not expect that the skirt worn by the woman was on fire, and she was called a "removal skirt" on the Internet.According to upstream news reports, on the major live APPs and e -commerce platforms, many female anchors wore the same skirts to bring goods on live broadcasts, and even the phenomenon of "one skirt is difficult to find".In this regard, the customer service of the short video platform stated that "if it involves infringement or bad information, there will be special staff to handle the live broadcast room."

From the beginning of the incident of focusing on the "holding the door" to the "exempting skirt", the public opinion has become the current "explosive model". Although it is mainly because some businesses and anchors have helped hot spots to help, in the final analysissilver.Therefore, no matter whether it is a live broadcast platform or an e -commerce platform, it cannot be ignored, and indirectly encourages this unfair wind to spread.

From the current situation, the treatment of related platforms is difficult to be called timely.A similar live room still exists, and on some e -commerce platforms, from dozens to hundreds of "exemption skirts".It seems that many merchants have regarded this wave of traffic as a business opportunity, and some platforms seem to be ready to deal with the plan. At least the "indulgence" is objective, which has contributed to the popularity of "exempting skirts".

In addition, there have been many imitations videos in the past two days. Net red wearing a clothing like the parties and human beings, doing almost the same actions.These "high imitation" videos are entertaining news events in a seemingly funny form. The bad taste of it is inevitable that these cottage "exempting skirts" involve serious issues such as intellectual property rights, and they must not be "funny".

Throughout the strange phenomenon around the "holding hands", because there is an irrational emotional driving, it has become a traffic carnival that many businesses and consumers and netizens are intentionally or unintentionally conspired.A fashion.

People do not see if they really like a product, or pay attention to the progress of the incident, but in the "symbol" of the consumer network incident -skirt to harvest a unreal public participation, and the cottage merchants and the InternetRed shooting "high imitation" video is undoubtedly taking the opportunity to make a profit.

Therefore, for these obvious infringements, the relevant platforms cannot be run rampant.Is there a clear authorization of the live broadcast rooms that advertise the same "exemption skirt"?Is it suspected of infringement?This requires the platform to actively verify and make a difference.

Seeing the increasingly "off" direction of public opinion, as far as the platform, we should adhere to the basic ethics of the business platform, such as legal, rules, intellectual property rights, etc. It is not allowed to use the "law to not blame the public" by the momentum of public opinion.The psychology tries to confuse.

In fact, this is not a new issue. It has always existed. As long as there is traffic, no matter whether the public event is good or bad, it will be coaxed.Therefore, the platform should also take the opportunity to form a corresponding long -term regulatory mechanism to maintain the wind and righteousness of the network environment, and avoid this kind of bottom -free hot spots.

It is necessary to spill a pot of cold water appropriately.Behind "Holding the Gate" is actually serious issues such as corruption and conversion of interests, and also about public interests.Whether a skirt looks good or not is not too related.

As the traffic is wrapped in related events, it is gradually moving towards absurdity, and all parties should have a brake to pull them back to the rule of law.If you blindly entertain the news incident, it will blur the focus, and it may also make his public lessons look frivolous.Disciplinary supervision was covered by lace news and seriously asked for being replaced by the unnecessary hustle and bustle. In the end, a public incident only left one place of chicken feathers. This is also a "loss".

At present, the "holding hands door" incident is still continuously fermented, but for the platform, you must not make mistakes and use this as a traffic dividend.Nowadays, the direction of the incident has shown a strange side. At this time, the platform should actively act, strengthen content management, and restrict the bottom line of speculation from the source.To ensure that the incident does not run, the platform shall perform its unswerving responsibilities.