Chen Haotian, chairman of the Hong Kong National Party, who has always promoted Hong Kong independence, was invited by the Hong Kong Foreign Journalist Conference last week to preach the independence field of Hong Kong.Promoting the United States to revoke the status of WTO members of Hong Kong.Although the event was obviously unconstitutional and illegal, the chief executive Lin Zheng Yue'e had no strong curbing before the incident, and did not severely investigate afterwards, and the so -called condemnation was even more weak.She has a weak performance, has a great sense of interest and perfunctory. This is equivalent to illegal illegal, which will make the Hong Kong independence organization even more unscrupulous. It will continue to spread like tumors and will eventually bring great disasters.

Only "regret" without fire

Before Chen Haotian delivered a "broadcast independence" speech in the middle of this month, he had various powerful arguments, pointing out that he was illegal.Earlier, the Police Department sent him more than 700 pages of documents to list him with the Hong Kong National Party's independence of Hong Kong's independence, the connection with the separationist organization, and the preparation for the use of force to fight for independent action.When the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Hong Kong asked foreign journalists to cancel the speech, it also clearly stated that the activities of the Hong Kong independence forces and engaged in split countries have seriously violated the Constitution and the "Basic Law".

Regarding Chen Haotian's preview will be tried to try the law, depending on the rule of law, if there is nothing wrong with the law, the SAR government should have stopped it according to law, but did not take action. When the Chief Executive publicly commented on the matter, he did not rebuke the lecture illegal, nor would it be banned.The institution is still arranging the theme of Hong Kong independence, and it is a pity and regret. "As for whether this event should be held, "it is determined by the relevant agencies."A simple "regret", the degree of firepower is so low that it can't be low. It makes people feel that it is just a statement and walking through the field. For Chen Haotian and foreign press conferences, there is no pressure, no pain and itching.

After the lecture was held, the government could still pursue it. It was severely dealt with Chen Haotian's suspected illegal behavior of Chen Haotian and the organizer, but the chief executive was just a hasty thing and did not chase.

Chen Haotian made a speech as the leader of the Hong Kong National Party that was on the same time, and the party was not a legal group. Therefore, his activities were also illegal, and the authorities could act on this.In addition, he repeatedly called on Hong Kong's independence in his speech. In addition to violating the "Basic Law", he also affected public order and touched public security laws.

Seeking interesting people will make evil results

As for the Hong Kong foreign press conference held by the event, although he claimed to be freedom of speech, because Chen Haotian's Hong Kong monologue and deeds violated the law, the association "assisted" him for committing the law. From the perspective of legal principles, it was also suspected of being violated.Some media have asked the Industry Department, which is responsible for renting the property to the association. The reply is that when the association uses the property, it must abide by Hong Kong law.In other words, if it is confirmed that the activities organized by the association, the authorities can cancel its lease and recover the property.

However, the Chief Executive brought it gently, and did not mention the problem that the association might violate the law. It only stated that "the incident touched the morality and responsibility of the civilized society", and also said whether to rent a property from the association is not the focus of the problem.It can be seen that the Chief Executive did not want to "offens" the association at all, but it was better to ask for the lease of the lease.

This incident revealed that the chief executive was too weak to the independence of Hong Kong, avoided conflicts, and was unwilling to fight back. This would undoubtedly condone illegal. If it continued, it would eventually cause catastrophic consequences.