The higher the negotiation level, the lower the Sino -U.S.

Social Comment

In the middle of this week, the Sino -US trade negotiations began again. The representatives of the two sides were Chinese Deputy Minister of Commerce Wang Shouwen and US Deputy Deputy Secretary Malpas.From the President of China and the United States, from the President of the President to the President, to the Vice Premier to the Minister of Finance, the Minister of Commerce, and the current deputy minister, the level of discussion is lower, which reflects that the bilateral relations are getting more and more rigid.The low level of this negotiation also shows that the two sides have found a meeting, and it is difficult to make breakthroughs.

Before the talks, Trump has threatened that China has not been able to come up with an acceptable agreement that the United States can. If the United States has not been treated fairly, it will not Andrdquo; all signs show that the Sino -U.S.At the end, it is likely to repeat the course of the Korean War and the Sino -US ambassador to the Sino -US ambassador in the 1950s and 1970s.

The Korean War Cructer negotiations have only signed a suspension agreement since July 27, 1953, and have been talking about playing in the past two years.The Sino -US Ambassador -level talks began to negotiate in Geneva since August 1, 1955, and then moved to the Polish capital in Geneva.It can be regarded as rare marathon negotiations in the history of world diplomatic.

This time, the Sino -US trade war negotiations have only been three months since May. Because the trade conflict between the two countries is caused by structural contradictions, frozen three feet is not a day cold, which is by no means resolving the deputy minister -level work talks.

China particularly emphasized that this time it was Andrdquo; and reiterated Andrdquo; and reiterated that "against unilateralism and trade protectionism, and did not accept any unilateral trade restrictions Andrdquo;On the basis of the dialogue and communication of Andrdquo;. It shows that in the previous lesson that the results of the previous negotiations have been repeatedly regretted by the United States, Beijing is cautious.

On the United States, Trump and his economic adviser Kudlo emphasized that it was Chinese and Chinese "want to talk about Andrdquo; and warn Beijing not to underestimate the US Andrdquo;

Malpas, the deputy financial minister led by the United States, is mainly responsible for finance, service trade and other fields, and the service trade is the largest source of trade with the United States to China. This surplus has increased by 33.7 times in the past 10 years.Trump is worried about whether Beijing will play the ace of the service trade. It may be sent to this service trade expert to find out. At the same time, he may also be responsible for the role of pressure on China to appreciate the RMB.

However, the continuous differences within the US government have also made it difficult for this talk.Wang Shouwen's negotiating opponents are not the US Department of Commerce but the Ministry of Finance. As we all know, US Treasury Secretary Menuchin is a pigeon in the Trump team in China.At the same time, the US Trade Representative Office proposed that public hearing to impose tariffs on US $ 200 billion in Chinese goods will also start tomorrow, which will make the negotiations start in the atmosphere of haze, which will be surprising.

Due to the recent signs of decline in the Chinese economy, on the contrary, the US economy is strong, and the trade war in the United States, and the Chinese master, so generally believe that the United States can take it in the negotiations.The White House economic adviser, Kudlo, said that China's economy was poor, it was declining, investment collapsed, and the people were selling RMB, and investors were withdrawing from China.

However, from the performance of the mainland stock market, the mainland people have accepted the influence of the continuous trade war, and the negative factor can be described as exhaustive; instead, the US listed company with high debt operations and high valuations has made U.S. stocks overwhelming in the environment of trade war.When you turn around, the US dollar raises interest rates or it is difficult to continue. The results of the mid -term elections can be imagined.Moreover, on the one hand, the United States advocates that the Chinese economy continues to weaken, but on the other hand, it pressures the Chinese government to lift the RMB exchange rate. This kind of strategic advantage requires an overwhelming strategic advantage to achieve it.

The United States launched this trade war in China not only a trade conflict, but also an important part of the strategic part of the United States trying to prevent China's rise. This trade war has broken through the category of trade disputes and is undergoing many fields such as China -US politics, security and humanistic exchanges.The overflow has seriously hindered the normal development of bilateral relations.This trade war actually shows that the end of the time when China has joined the WTO, and China and the United States have entered the era of competition.

At the beginning of 2002 to join the WTO, China ’s global economy was less than half of Japan, less than one fifth of the United States, smaller than ASEAN.But now, China is already three times that of Japan, close to two -thirds of the United States.If Deng Xiaoping proposes to Andrdquo; when China is just a little white rabbit, today's China is already a bully.In the past, we can only re -adjust in the new situation.

Although China is unwilling to fight the trade war, it has to fight; although the trade war has increased to some extent, it has increased the external risk and decline pressure of the Chinese economy.

The fundamentals of China's economic fundamentals are still stable, there are enough toughness, and there is room for rotation of impact.The Chinese government should turn this crisis into an opportunity to deepen China's reform, actively activate the domestic market, improve the domestic business environment, and truly establish a fair, fair, reasonable, and effective business mechanism.Reform and opening up, unswervingly develop yourself, accelerate the adjustment of industrial structure, increase the efforts of scientific and technological innovation, and stabilize the impact of the negative impact of the trade war on expected.

In this way, the United States is not easy to force China to sign the city under the city.