Early Andnbsp; Andnbsp; Andnbsp; Andnbsp; Ji Yan Chunqiu
The United States and the European Union issued a joint statement on Wednesday to announce that they would work together to achieve zero tariffs, zero subsidies, and protecting companies from both parties from the infringement of unfair global trade. The European Union and Japan have previously reached a free trade agreement.Will the United States and Europe and Japan join forces and "beaten Andrdquo; China, these days have triggered controversy in Chinese online public opinion.
The United States and Europe jointly stated that the two parties will work closely with relevant partners to promote the reform of the WTO (WTO) to solve unfair trade behaviors, including intellectual property theft, mandatory technology transfer behavior, industrial subsidies, state -owned enterprises caused by state -owned enterprisesTurn and overcapacity issues.
Although there is no Chinese name, the statement of the statement is self -evident.
Some public opinion believes that the prototype of the new international trade system led by Europe, America and Japan has taken shape, and the existing WTO framework will gradually be replaced by new trade agreements. China is likely to be excluded from this new trading system and become the lonely people.Essence
For a while, the sound of singing in China in the media has emerged again.For example, the United States, Japan and Europe are going to form a joint front. The WTO is over and kicked China out of the circle without playing with China.Does the United States and Europe reached a trade agreement, did China be calculated again?etc.
At the time of the Sino -US trade war, these voices are obviously suspected of disrupting the army in the official eyes.As a result, some titled articles were blocked, and WeChat accounts with official backgrounds also published articles to refute the above discussion.
The Global Network published an article signed "Housha Andrdquo; said that the eight characters of the US -Europe Free Trade Agreement have not yet been skimmed, and the joint statement is just a intention.The trade agreement was signed, and the "keyboard hit two more times, and even the US -Japan -Europe Free Trade Agreement had Andrdquo;
The article accuses some people who are eager to see the situation of China being besieged. And "If there is no such situation, create this atmosphere and panic everyone. To put it bluntly, it is public opinion.ANDRDQUO;. AND "" AND ", compared with the blood of some writers, European media was not excited after Junci returned, because they had no confidence in Trump.Andrdquo;
The article believes that the so -called US -Japan -Europe and the "anti -Chinese ANDRDQUO; the imagination of anti -Chinese ANDRDQUO.The US -Japan -Europe Trade War joined forces and "anti -Chinese ANDRDQUO; to serve this strategic. Jumping out of the trade war can see their face more clearly.
However, some scholars believe that the United States, the European Union and Japan have begun to create a new common market. The evolution trend of the world economic pattern has completely exceeded China's expectations and imagination. China has no way to block the evolution of the world economic pattern.It may become an outsider again.
An article signed by the China Institute of World Economic Research Institute of Fudan University pointed out that in the face of the United States, Europe and Japan, the following views are very harmful to the correct response method of choosing in China: First, the United States, Europe, and Japan have their own interests.As for, it is impossible for them to build such a new common market at least in the short term.This idea of looking forward to others failed to make themselves victory is very A Q -style, and it is still based on the authority of Chinese traditional culture in terms of thinking logic.
Second, no matter how the United States, Europe, and Japan do, they cannot change China's international status.China is the consumer market after the United States, and the West will not give up easily.China's role in the global industrial chain cannot be replaced.And from this conclusion, we can change the world, but the world is inseparable from us, and we are all on a boat.This can be said to be a serious misjudgment.
Will the controversy of the United States and Europe and Japan "besieged andrdquo; China is actually standing on different positions and expressing different views on China's internal and external policies. Except for some extreme views, although the parties may argue may be possibleThey are biased, but they also have constructive opinions.
For example, the United States, Europe and Japan, of course, have the intention and action of curbing China's rise strategically, but in terms of trade, it is impossible to exclude China ’s world’ s first cargo trade country.At the same time, the Sino -US trade war has indeed exposed many disadvantages of China's economic and trade model, as well as insufficient reform, insufficient opening up, etc. China must come up with the courage and courage of the early days of reform and opening up to overcome these disadvantages.
From a larger level, Chinese society is still in a period of challenging, and the serious instability of the Sino -US trade war is normal. It is normal to have different voices.For different sounds, suppression is not a good way to solve problems. On the basis of tolerance, it can better resolve differences and condense consensus through rational debates.Officials should have more confidence in this.
