The New York Times website has published two articles. David Marchese's Golden Carved Feather: Can the United States really understand China?And a "original China" that the United States does not understand Peter Coy, all involved the book of the New China strategy of Professor Jin Kouyu, a professor of the London School of Political Economics: Beyond the New China PlayBook: Beyond Socialism and Capitalism (To.Golden Carrier claims that the West's understanding of China has "serious defects" (about China's economic ambitions, etc.).If the United States alone is concerned, officials and scholars are generally on the other side of the Pacific. Based on the knowledge and experience of the country, it is limited to understanding Chinese issues -but this limit should include two aspects.And not comprehensive understanding of all kinds of disadvantages and darkness.Assume that the United States can really fully and thoroughly grasp the situation of contemporary China, and the overall evaluation of China may not be more positive than it is now.
Is there a "serious defect" in China?For example, she believes that China's current economic challenge is to overcome the middle income traps. "This is not all about replacing the United States as a global hegemon, which will bring huge burdens and responsibilities to China.Take the responsibility. "The goal of China's development includes overcoming the middle income trap, but it is not limited to that.China has a longer -term goal, such as "catch up with the United States" in terms of economy, science and technology, and military.As for how to bear the corresponding responsibilities (like the "world overlord"), China's highest leadership may not think in depth.Because of specific limitations, they lack distant vision in some aspects.
Regarding the issue of China's industrial espionage, Jin Kouyu did not deny, but said: "China likes to take a shortcut at the beginning, wants to be an innovator, and wants to become great. But there is no complete legal framework or available rules and rules andLaw. "However, this is not only related to the insufficient regulations, but also to the corruption atmosphere of all sectors of China.I am very familiar with the Chinese academic community. For many years, I have a general mentality of quick success. In order to obtain the benefits as soon as possible, they do not hesitate to falsify, plagiarize plagiarism (but conceal as much as possible).National topics and various awards.The politics and business circles are similar to the academic circles.This should be regarded as the "social soil" existing in industrial spy activities.
Golden Carrier also proposed that most Chinese people believe that safety is more important than freedom.She may make at least some Chinese people feel "represented again".In China, the government's "security measures" objects include not only potential criminals that endanger the people, but also cover the people themselves.Officials believe that the public has unstable and unsafe factors in the middle and long term.At present, the basic contradictions in Chinese society can be said to be the contradiction between officials and the people. The first thing officials are pursuing their own system of safety and maintaining privileges. To this end, the freedom and even security of the people can be sacrificed.
For the people, security and freedom are interconnected to each other, rather than eliminating the other.In some areas, it is difficult to truly get security, and it is difficult to really get freedom.The strong sense of insecurity makes the Chinese generally dare not publicize public criticism.This sense of insecurity comes from the internal fear of the government.The government's threat to the security of the people has enabled the people to "consciously" give up or restrict multiple freedom of freedom, including freedom of speech, freedom of rally, freedom of association, and freedom of strike.
The daughter of the senior official thought that the Chinese leadership "eager hope" avoids extensive inequality.Is this really the case?Mao Zedong will believe that China has achieved unprecedented equality.The real situation is that the mainland government regime has eliminated some old and unequal, but created new inequality, such as new inequality between dry groups and urban and rural areas.In addition, the "Politician" land, rich, anti -
Reform and opening up has been unprecedentedly differentiated in the past years, the division of the rich and the poor in China is unprecedented, and the inequality of many fields has also intensified, and the phenomenon of "class solidification" has emerged.In fact, some current systems, policies, and hidden rules are the causes of multiple inequality or seriousness.Under the corruption system, the Xu Changyuan family, the former secretary of the Jinzhou District Committee of Dalian City, had 2,714 units of the seized real estate; the former director of the Tianjin Public Security Bureau Wu Changshun involved in the case of more than 7.4 billion yuan (about S $ 1.4 billion, the same below).In contrast, there are about 30 people in Shanghai's three -bedroom and one -living group renting houses. Former Chinese Prime Minister Li Keqiang said that China has 600 million low -income and below people, with an average monthly income of about 1,000 yuan.Those like Xu Changyuan and Wu Changshun were only nine cattle and one hairy among officials. Many corrupt elements still made anti -corruption reports on the stage.
Golden Carrier also advocates that "the bottom line is to avoid American capitalism" "China wants to become a larger and more wise Germany."China cannot develop American capitalism, and it is difficult to develop German capitalism.At present, China will only follow the path of "Chinese -style modernization". Specifically, it is from the transformation of bureaucratic socialism, monopoly socialism, skirting socialism, to transform bureaucratic capitalism, monopoly capitalism, and skirt capitalism.
