Source: Zhongshi News Network
Author: Liu Jincai
The Democratic Progressive Party legislators and deputy chairman of the Sports Commission, Guo Zhengliang, issued a statement of retiring the party.Guo Zhengliang's leave of the DPP can be described as a major loss of the Democratic Progressive Party. He once actively participated in the DPP's important political factions, duties and the formation of party resolutions.This symbolizes the traditional pan -beautiful island department within the DPP party, not only has its power and routes that have not yet settled; at the same time, the party has abandoned the historical heritage of the "bold" route and the rigidity of policy thinking.
The leadership of the Pan Meili Island is the leader of the former chairman Huang Xinjie and Xu Xinliang, and as it fades out of the historical stage, many think tanks are far from the political core decision -making power. Guo Zhengliang's retreat means that the Democratic Progressive Party has since been more pragmatic from the Cross -Strait route.Strategic thinking and planning of sex, innovation, macro, and forward -looking.It also symbolizes the conservative anti -cross -strait thinking of the long -term advocacy of the "strong book", and eventually crushed the open cross -strait thinking of the "bold and westward" faction.
The "Pan New Trends" that advocates "pragmatism independence" and "strong standards" has been turned from political staff such as think tanks, strategists and other political staff, and flipped to the political new nobility, including Vice President (Lai Qingde), and Deputy Council of the Executive Yuan of the Executive Yuan.Long (Zheng Wencan), Deputy Dean of the Legislative Yuan (Cai Qichang) and the Dean of Supervision (Chen Ju).At the same time, the Congress advocated promoting the "Taiwan's Normal State Movement and the Name of Taiwan", which was affiliated to the second largest faction within the party and grasped the Legislative President (You Xizheng) and the Secretary -General of the Presidential Palace (Lin Jialong).
The Fan Meili Island is declining, and the party leader Xu Xinliang proposed "bold advancement" and "emerging nation" discussions gradually disappeared.As an important think tank of the Pan -beautiful Island Department, Guo Zhengliang and other strategists such as former party secretary Zhang Junhong and former Deputy Secretary -General of the National Security Council Chen Zhongxin have all played an important party discussion and resolution.Strategies, "boldly advanced", and "emerging nations" innovate macro -strategic thinking; introduce the "Taiwan future resolution" to avoid the DPP further move towards "legal Taiwan independence".The department plays the role and role of "peaceful buffer" between the Republic of China system and independence pursuing "legal Taiwan independence".The strategic thinking of "bold and westward" is difficult to deposit in the DPP party, which means that the power structure of the co -governance of traditional factions within the party has weakened.
The Democratic Progressive Party's diversified layered power structure and route proposal gradually moved towards the centralized power structure of "Lai Core".Consensus is "one country, two systems", and Taiwanese are not Chinese, confusing audiovisual.The disappearance of the Fanmei Island's decline and the "bold" route has prompted the DPP to turn from open and forward cross -strait policy thinking to conservative counter -strategic thinking.In the past, cross -strait also belonged to the Chinese nation, a Chinese, cross -strait theory, Germany models, federal, federation, and the National Committee of the Association.Such compression and narrowing the above claims highlight the traditional "democratic progress" attributes of the DPP to allow the "domestication and domestication". Today, the Democratic Progressive Party is closed and conservative authoritarian image, just like the Kuomintang who had criticized the Kuomintang in the past.
It is worth noting that although bold thinking westward thinking has disappeared in the DPP's domestic sales, this open avant -garde route affects the cross -strait discussion and route of the former Taipei mayor and the chairman of the Taiwan party.When the anti -cross -strait discussions and routes caused cross -strait relations to fall in the spiral hostile, former Taipei Mayor Ke Wenzhe once said and his cross -strait routes, similar to the former DPP chairman Xu Xinliang proposed a "bold" policy.As the gentle and pragmatic route in the DPP was gradually abandoned, the westward policy not only had the effect of attracting the gentle and pragmatic forces of the DPP.When selling Taiwan ", but Ke Wenzhe insisted on cross -strait city exchanges to continue the Shanghai and Taiwan Double City Forum.
Ke Wenzhe once emphasized that cross -strait exchanges must be brave and actively communicating, which is highlighting the current dilemma of cross -strait exchanges.Whether it is the former Chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party Xu Xinliang, the Fanmei Island Department, and as a think tank Guo Zhengliang, the "bold development" strategy; or Lai Qingde, the vice president of the "pro -China Love Terrace" route, has emphasized the expansion of cross -strait exchanges and exchanges and exchanges and exchanges on both sides of the strait.Cooperation is important, but it only has a historical mark like a flash.Lai Qingde has advocated "pro -China love Taiwan" and Germany's unity is truly unified. It is not a problem to recognize the "1992 Consensus" and abolish the "referendum Taiwan independence party."The "Peace -Baozai" route is trying to alleviate the "anti -China -China" route and the "United -US Anti -China" strategy collision against cross -strait relations.However, after all, it is "the sound of thunder and heavy rain". These policy discussions lack the theoretical structure and the substantial connotation, and give people a light proposal without substantial policy planning.
Some of them seem to be "bold" strategic thinking. Although it has the characteristics of vagueness and the characteristics of the middle mild route, it ultimately lost to the "path dependence" of the inertia of "pragmatic Taiwan independence".Lai Qingde advocated that "cross -strait relations are international relations" and declared that he was a "pragmatic Taiwan independence worker". This is probably the greatest irritable, provocative cross -strait route and Taiwan national positioning since the election of president in 2000."Significance, vigorously marginalized the Cross -Strait discussion; even simplifying the" independence of sovereignty of the Republic of China "is equal to" pragmatic Taiwan independence ", which will cause the DPP's cross -strait routes and policies to lose strategic buffer space.
As the highest power in the Democratic Progressive Party, Tsai Ing -wen not only unable to unite the party, but also leads to many traditional parties who oppose the democracy of forces and have left this logo democratic and progressive value.As a highly integrated power of party and government power, Tsai Ing -wen could have mastered the dominance and discourse rights of cross -strait relations.At the same time, in terms of political interaction between political parties, it has also alienated the aggregation of the country between political parties, leading to the expansion of differences.
The past Cai Yingwen's cross -strait routes and discussions have fallen into hollow, conservative and countermeasures. In the end, it is difficult to establish a "new model" of "structural cooperation" on both sides of the strait.The specific pragmatic and feasible policy plan and forward -looking thinking are as good as it is.This claim has predictability, consistency, non -confrontation, and not provoking the discussions of the Cross -Strait Cross -Strait, and repeatedly emphasized the political slogan "democracy, peering, peace, and dialogue".hostility.
We can't help asking, if Lai Qingde will continue to inherit "Cai Zhi Lai Sui" and "deepen practice", this may only intensify the government's official Taiwan policies from "harmony" to "martial arts" to "martial arts"EssenceGuo Zhengliang's departure from the DPP is worth pondering. If the DPP can not tolerate the "bold" route and tolerance and diversified discussion of each other, this is equivalent to handing the initiative to the development of cross -strait relations to other political parties;Lack of cross -strait governance capabilities, so that the regime is sent to other positive policies as a political party.
