The attack on the interview after the interview of the Chinese ambassador to France was still spreading, and 80 European members jointly asked France to expel Ambassador Lu Shaye.Of course, this requirement is ridiculous. Lao Hu believes that France will not submit to the pressure of those parliamentarians to do stupid things.
First of all, Lushaye is a full -scale ambassador for China to France in France. In terms of Sino -French affairs, he has the full power on behalf of the Chinese government and is responsible for Sino -French relations. and Ukrainian affairs are not within his scope of power. French media interviewed him and asked about the details of Ukrainian affairs, which gave him the opportunity to express general opinions.Although he was a diplomat, he talked about affairs other than the scope of his authority in the free talks like television, and his official representativeness must be greatly reduced.Regarding the Ukrainian issue and the status of the former Soviet Union, many officials have elaborated that those explaining the formal stance of these issues of these issues, those positions in Europe and the world are clear.
Chinese ambassador to France in France was accepted an interview screen by the interview screen.screenshot.(Figure source: Fa Guang)
Second, Ambassador Lu Shaye accepted a long interview. His overall explaining Lao Hu read carefully, there was no problem. The specific statement of his Ukrainian affairs has the special context of the entire interview. It should not be taken out separately and displayed under the magnifying glass.And in the discussion with reporters, it should not be accurate, but to understand the amount of information of the matter. In this way, we must have the protection of the right to express the right to express.Ambassador Lu provides more information about non -supervisor affairs, and does not have a conclusion that he has made martial arts.The French public opinion agency actively requested such an exclusive interview. France should protect the right of expression of Ambassador Lu as a whole. It should not be turned over afterwards to make political discussions. It will be a shame of France.
Third, some Western public opinion brought Ambassador Luosan to the program of French television stations and repeatedly asked the reporter to answer as a "wolf wolf" manifestation. This is an aggressive evaluation.Essence Chinese diplomats are interviewed, and they do not explain China's foreign policy according to their own disciplines and Ganba, but express their views freely. This is generally expected by Western media institutions.The questioning method of interviewing the reporter of the Ambassador Lu Shayan was quite aggressive. Ambassador Lu's response was very polite. He labeled such a "wolf war wolf" label, and there was no field basis at all. For Chinese and Western exchanges, there would only be more obstacles.
Finally, Lao Hu wants to say to domestic netizens here that Ambassador Lu is a diplomat. He needs to respond to attacks in a diplomatic manner and eliminate misunderstandings. What we need to do is: First, support to support, support to supportAmbassador Lu.Second, do not use our domestic emotional restrictions on Ambassador Lu to carry out various communication activities. We should encourage the final soft landing of things, so that Sino -French and China -EU relations will continue to increase mutual understanding in friction, and stronger digestion and tolerance capabilities in friction.the trend of.
