Lin Fangbiao
A few days ago, four Taiwanese scholars, Feng Jianan, Guo Lixin, Fu Dawei, and Lu Qianyi, jointly held a press conference on the "2023 Anti -War Working Group" to ask for "peace, anti -military fire, autonomy, and climate".In short, they believe that the culprit of the Russian and Ukraine war is the provocation of the United States and calls on the United States to stop militaryism and economic sanctions.The Taiwan Strait crisis is also the United States. Taiwan should maintain an equal distance from China and the United States to maintain autonomy. In addition, Taiwan should convert national defense budgets into social welfare and slow climate change.The content of this statement seems to be fragmented, unknown, and has been tarted from all walks of life.
Feng Jianan and Guo Lixin are well -known scholars in news, communication, and culture. They have been in the text for many years, leading progressive thinking, and have been respected in Taiwan society.Fu Da is the history of science, and Lu Qianyi ’s academic expertise is EU politics and immigration policy.All four have their own academic status, and it is not generally Professor Yangchun.As a result, the reporter will trigger the echo of society.
Taiwan has not intended to invade other countries, and strengthen military reserve to resist the martial arts of mainland China.Today, the four scholars' anti -troops said that they were not surrender, and they wondered that they didn't know what they were talking about.Obviously, it has been aimed at Taiwan, instead of the United States for more than 2,000 missiles for many years; coupled with the recent continuous military aircraft disturbances in mainland China, four scholars have said that the United States will have the greatest responsibility, which is completely different from the awareness of ordinary people.EssenceIf Taiwan's anti -aggression is interpreted as fighter and provocative, it is unacceptable to ordinary Taiwanese people.
It is unknown. Some of them have been anti -US for many years and have always agreed with any anti -US issue. Everyone has already seen it. They may still live in the anti -war trend of the 1960s, and the time and space capsule is still retained to this day.Some people think that at the stage of Sino -US confrontation today, they are still fighting against the Qing Dynasty. I do n’t know how to have changed the world today.These people were unclear, but they were on their own with the lighthouse, trying to lead the Taiwanese to get out of confusion and see the clouds.However, Taiwan's public opinion generally believes that they are blind and blind, and related discussions are not worth mentioning.
Of course, climate change is an important issue.However, even if Taiwan has reached almost impossible zero carbon row and becomes an enviable environmentally friendly green island, will mainland China abandon Wu Tong Taiwan because of this?Otherwise, what does it matter to pay attention to the peace of the climate and the peace of the Taiwan Strait?If the reports from their students pull two things that are not related, the four teachers may be scolded, but why is the statement issued so unbearable?The host Wang Hao, the host of the Political Act, refuted the statement with a long text, and wished the four scholars at the end of the article and wished the four scholars' health and academic progress.
The academic reputation of these four scholars will not be wiped out by a statement of a tart.However, the predecessors had Yun "knowing what they knew, and they did not know what they knew, and they knew it." Cross -strait relations were not projects specializing in these scholars, but they stood up to guide the public with unsightly discussions. This attitude angered many Taiwanese people.Some Taiwanese scholars pointed at their layman's affairs, and it is inevitable that they laugh and make themselves look light, which is really regrettable.
Long Yingtai, a former writer Long Yingtai, published an article saying "I am anti -war anyway."At that time, she was criticized, saying why did she shout against Beijing?The anti -war in Taiwan was boring and unnecessary, and Taiwan did not intend to fight. The task of the army has always been anti -aggression.Long Yingtai's remarks will not have any political consequences in Taiwan, but in mainland China, it is different. It can be seen that she is just a soft pinch of persimmons.
Anti -war really has a certain market in Taiwan. However, the proposal has never been able to mention the specific method of anti -war, and blindly ask for demands from the power.This kind of saying is cliché and has no opinion, but it is just naive and peaceful idiot.
The author is Malaysian Writer
