< /DIV>
Since the "Top Speed Andrdquo; sincerdquo; in the system of the Washington Foreign Policy, the people in the system of Foreign Policy have complex mood and are incredible, fear, and anger.The stage humiliated itself, and the Russian president looked beside him, showing a disaster smile on his face.
For Vladimir Putin, Vladimir and Vladimir Putin must be very proud of this embarrassment to the United States.The world view of the Russian President is based on such a concept that West has been deliberately weakening and humiliating Russia for decades.From Putin's view, it is now the time of revenge.
Now visiting Moscow is like walking into a mirror hall and placed in it. Each Russia's invasion is reflected back, which has become a necessary response to the so -called western aggression.
In the United States and Britain, Russia was regarded as a country that resorted to violence. It annexed Crimea and launched a military conflict that was not promoted in eastern Ukraine.Russia's response is that Western allies have implemented larger aggression in Iraq and Libya, and threatened Russia by expanding NATO to its border.In Moscow, the annexed Crimea was depicted as a defense move, and some of the purpose was to ensure that the Russian Navy's base at Sevastopol would never stop at NATO warships.
How to explain the allegations of Russia's disruption of the US democracy?Putin -style response (if it is not commonly denied), the United States has tried to subvert Russia's political system for a long time.Putin publicly supported Hillary Clinton to Hillary Clinton's anti -Poping protests that broke out from 2011 to 2012, which may drive him to obstruct the Democratic presidential candidate in the 2016 US election.
From the perspective of London or Washington, one of the most shuddering places led by Putin is that it appeals violence around the world (from Ukraine to the United Kingdom), and then organizes lies organically.It is difficult to discuss these tactics with Russian officials because they will never admit that they are lying.But from the lines, we can understand that Putin's defender has two major reasons: first, the West also lied; second, Russia was besieged, and deception and lies were necessary defense mechanisms.
In this sense, Russia's official position on world affairs has no bottom line on the one hand, and on the other hand, it is very sincere.The responsibility of the Russian government is to spread lies on its own behavior and even the entire world.
But it really believes that there is a legitimate reason to spread these lies, because they are part of a comprehensive battle that fights the dishonesty and aggression against the West.
Russian officials' personal behavior is also mixed with the same selfishness and sincerity.One of the views on Putin and its core small circle is that their motivation is completely profitable.As a Russian friend explained to me: And "The only thing that really troubles them is that you stand between them and the withdrawal machine. Anandrdquo;
However, although corruption is deeply fixed in Russia, this does not mean that Putin and his consultants are not real nationalists.
As a result, Russia and the West may be observing the same series of incidents, but they see different situations.When I recently watched England's World Cup against Colombia in a Russian bar, I suddenly thought of this.When England got a penalty and a number of Colombian players was warned, this seemed to be more convinced that England's opponent was a rough team, and they were punished.But in the eyes of Colombian fans sitting around me, the same incident proved that the game was manipulated and the referee had prejudice against them.
In the same way, my opinion is that Russia conducts violent interference in Ukraine, shot down a civil airliner, and then poisoned in Britain, so it was naturally sanctioned by economic sanctions.The Russians saw the same incident, but their conclusions were that economic sanctions further proved the West's deep hatred of Russia.(This should not be punished at all, the referee is favored by one!)
Acknowledging that there are different views, it does not mean that it is helpless to accept complete relativism.Putin and its followers have blamed all the frustrations in Russia in 1991 to blame the conspiracy in the West.The country that joined NATO after the Cold War was due to their voluntary choices, because modern history made them deeply fear of Russia.From 2011 to 2012, the demonstrators on the streets of Moscow were not the puppets of the United States.They are a group of real Russians with real dissatisfaction.Similarly, the economic and political confusion that Russia appeared in Russia in the 1990s was not the so -called Andrdquo of Putinist "the West imposed to Russia's Andrdquo; but from the collapse of the Soviet system and the errors of the Russian government afterwards.
But now, the American democratic system that was bathed in the joy of victory in 1989 was in trouble.At the same time, Russia has been regarded as a superpower with a considerable position by a US president.
For Putin, this is a sweet time.For American liberals, this should be a reason for reflection.Most of the differences in Russia led by Putin stems from their failure to deal with domestic problems, but they like to blame all the troubles of their country on the West.Today, it is very seductive for American liberals. He blames their own Andrdquo; but of which the Trump nightmare Andrdquo; but whether it is for Russia or the United States, the real problem stems from the domestic problem..
Translator/Shen Kai
