Source: Xinhua News Agency
A more rare scene appeared on the Hangzhou Asian Games track and field on October 1.In the women's 100 -meter column final, Chinese player Wu Yanni and Alagi in India were judged to grab a foul, and both of them protested to the referee. After communicating with the referee, they returned to the starting line and completed the game.Wu Yanni, the second collision after the game, was canceled, and Alagi, who hit the third line, won the silver medal.
Why can I continue the game if I was sentenced to run?Why is the two performers effective and one is invalid?In fact, a series of penalties and decisions of on -site referees were made in accordance with the corresponding terms of the World Field Competition rules and technical rules.
In the competition rules and technical rules released on its official website, the World Federation of Fields explains the rules of similar situations under the content of the eighth chapter of the technical rules.Proposed oral protests. After comprehensive consideration of the existing data, the referee believed that when the athlete protest was possible, the athletes who protested should be proposed to complete the game and made the final decision after the event.After the game, if the athletes still think that the protests are foul, the athletes should be canceled.
Athletic competition expert Shen Chunde said that the World Field Federation formulates the corresponding rules, mainly to ensure the smooth progress of the competition.In the past competitions, some athletes had objections to judging penalties for running and offending, and refused to leave the field, which caused the game to delay for more than ten minutes.At present, the judgment of rushing criminals during the start of high -level track and field competitions is generally made with the help of the starting information system.The athletes who started the information system were simple and intuitive when the start of the starting response, at a glance.
Taking the game of the night as an example, Wu Yanni started 0.214 seconds before the gunshot, so she was eventually invalid.Alagi in India starts 0.016 seconds before the shooting.Although it was also running, Shen Chunde said that Indian athletes did not start 0.198 seconds after Wu Yanni started.Under normal circumstances, people's reactions are 0.100 seconds. Alagi has more reasons to prove that she starts in advance by Wu Yanni. In this case, she should not be punished.Essence
