Chen Liujun

The 2023 Group Twenty Group (G20) in India's Finance Minister and Foreign Minister's meeting has ended, but noneIn addition, the embarrassment and helplessness of this important international platform is undoubtedly highlighted in front of the world.The development dilemma of the G20 deserves attention.

G20, which was established in 1999, has always been highly hoped by the world. It has arisen in the context of responding to the global financial crisis. It has been established as the main forum for international economic cooperation.Sexual events.Because it covers 55%of the global land area, 65%of the population, 75%of the trade volume, and 85%of the GDP, it has unparalleled authority and influence, and it is indeed an important organization that can dominate the development prospects of the world.The greater significance of the G20 is probably the model of establishing a large country's cooperation. After all, the devastating human disaster in history is caused by the confrontation of the big country. The weight of the small country is not enough to lead to a global crisis.

However, today's G20 has obviously reached the key development bottleneck period, and it is not as simple as the Treasury Secretary and Foreign Minister Club this year.

First of all, this mechanism originally positioned as a platform for economic cooperation now has to face the impact of political issues.Simply talk about the economy and does not involve politics. It was originally an ideal state. Under the international environment of relatively peaceful and economic development, it was barely feasible, just like the previous financial crisis in Southeast Asia and the European sovereign debt crisis.However, if major global political events are encountered, economic issues obviously cannot be carried out alone. For example, today's Russia -Ukraine War has seriously impacted the international political pattern and will inevitably affect the platform such as G20.Therefore, the United States and the West will ask for the political positions of everyone on the Russia and Ukraine War before they can conduct the next steps. Russia and China want to simply focus on economic issues, which seems to become weak and lonely.

Secondly, this forum that originally did not have a constraint mechanism was unable to cope with the members' self.The Foreign Minister's Association held on March 2nd, the Japanese Foreign Minister did not attend, nor did he propose acceptable and specific reasons to make the organizer India dissatisfied.Although some people are absent from a trivial matter, the group, which is helpless, is a problem that cannot be underestimated. Just like the school who cannot restrain the class, it proves the incompetence of the school itself.

This year's G20 has encountered such embarrassment. What is slightly comforted is that this is not unique to the G20; even if there is a certain constraint mechanism, the same is true.It can only be replaced by the position of the UN General Assembly; the appealing agencies of the World Trade Organization have not been a judge in the past three years. What is the significance of those coming allegations and appeals?

Once again, the G20 coordination mechanism is stranded, which will seriously crack down on the confidence of global recovery.Both the United Nations Security Council and G20 have been regarded as the ambitions and moral images of great powers with sacred alliances. They are the jets that lead the world that leads to prosperity and stability. It has an unpredictable sense of responsibility and mission.After three years of coronary disease, the worsening ecological environment, and the stimulus of the current Russia and Ukraine War, the international community urgently needed stable and responsible leaders or institutions to lead all mankind out of the predicament and light to light.However, the division shown today in the G20 has made the "Global Southern" countries be confused. I have to consider the side selection team in different fields, let alone the difficulties that they encountered in development in unity.

The international community, which is very confident, pays attention to the G20. It is better to pay attention to the 36th Summit of the African Union held in Ethiopia on February 18th, which is the attitude that countries should show in order to develop.

In the end, the most helplessness is that the G20 development bottleneck period does not seem to have a good solution.Not to mention when the G20 can create a glorious or the turning of the shadow, and face up to the current dilemma: the G20 conflict caused by the Russian and Ukraine War, there is almost no room for compromise and rotation.Because there are huge differences in the positions, interests, and values between countries, there are zero -sum games that are competitive in regional and world -led power, and seeking room for cooperation is becoming increasingly difficult.

At least so far, there is no suitable solution in the world to respond to such problems, and the G20 is the same.Under common sense, when things cannot continue, they always go back. The back road of the G20 is to return to the conflict of the conflict of the country, and sometimes it has to be allowed to rise with the conflict spiral.

Maybe, returning to the confrontation between the Seventh Kingdom Group (G7) and the BRICS (BRICS) is just one of the pessimistic predictions of the G20; the G20 is reduced to the Qing Tan Group, and it is increasingly scattered and dependent.It is one of the possibilities of greater probability.The G20 manifests the current development bottleneck, finds the path of breakthrough, and advances in the dispute, is one of the beautiful visions of human beings.

The author is a commentator in Yangzhou, China