Source: Taiwan Economic Daily
Economic Daily Theory
The issue of Taiwan ’s tax superb cash is noisy. On the one hand, it has covered many economic issues that are more worthy of exploring, and on the other hand, it also highlights the phenomenon of dissatisfaction with many people’ s living conditions.In theory, if the fruit of economic growth can really be shared by the whole people, the dazzling economic growth figures in recent years should not lead to such a great sense of deprivation, and even reflected in the disparity results of the election.The reason is that if it is not an economic goal error, the execution process is not proper.
Over the years, economic growth has been the most watched economic good indicator. Relatively, the distribution of income has always been neglected.However, the deterioration of distribution is one of the most obvious representations of Taiwan's economy at this moment.After the three -year epidemic, the M -type manifestation of the industry has also led to the M -shaped M -type of labor salary. Some people can receive a year -end bonus for decades in succession.The inflation of the year and a half is a blow to the middle and low -income class. The reduction of substantive salary represents "actually deprived" instead of only "deprivation".
The same salary is the same as the substantive salary, and the economic growth rate is also an economic variable after deducting the factors of prices. Therefore, if economic growth is really shared by the whole people, the growth rate of substantial salary should be close to the economic growth rate.However, the actual situation is not only in the court, but also the opposite direction. It is no wonder that democratic elections will truly reflect the grievances in the hearts of most people.
Taiwan Tsai Ing -wen revealed that the government's economic goal was "innovation, employment, and distribution" at the beginning of the first party -hope to drive high -quality employment through the innovation of the industry, and thereby achieving a good distribution of the people shared by the people.Well, it is logical, but after a few years, the economic results are good, and the sharing of the whole people may not be recognized.Economic goals are neither a meaning, but what needs to be cared about is the execution process.
In recent years, the biggest momentum of Taiwan's economic growth is to benefit from Taiwanese businessmen to return to Taiwan.In addition to increasing the economic growth rate of investment, the benefits of investment are that they hope to provide more high -quality and high -quality job opportunities to drive the growth of overall salary. Even the latter is the main purpose. After all, investment or exports are just means. Good employmentThe salary is the economic goal.As a result, Taiwan does increase many high salary employment; however, salary increases will inevitably impact the low salary industries, especially the most obvious domestic demand service industry in the low salary.It is an example.In fact, when the investment trend starts to drive high salary employment to solve the predicament of general low salary, the government should consider these possible follow -up effects.If you encounter low -paying industries, you can only provide assistance in compromise. Whether it is to increase open migrant workers or dew, it is unobstructed, rather than guiding industrial transformation or tranquility or tranquility. Of courseThe type of economic existence is difficult to change forever, and the dilemma of low salaries and the people's grievances are difficult to eradicate.
Taxes' criteria for cash have been criticized for two points.First, the economic achievements are shared by the whole people. It is never achieved by general cash. Instead, it should be achieved through good industrial profit and salary. This is the basic economic principle.Second, Pufa Cash will make limited resources unable to use in the use of the highest investment rate. This is also the basic principle of fiscal fiscal.Based on these two points, although Pufa's cash can get a momentary pleasure, it may sacrifice the sweeter fruit in the future.
If you refer to overseas experience, in order to generally raise salary and allow companies that are willing to pay high salaries to enjoy tax reduction and other discounts, the Netherlands promotes innovation in the corporate community to create profit, and government resources only give companies with innovative elements and related efforts.This tells us that when the resources are limited, if you spend it equally, you will usually not bring any cause of stimulus, and there will be no greater and beautiful fruit in the future.
If the Taiwanese government really attaches importance to the goal of "innovation, employment, and distribution", it should carefully examine whether the limited resources and policy tools at hand are moving towards this goal, but the facts may be mostly with the target ingredients.On the occasion of the government after this election, we hope that the government can see fundamental problems, rather than only providing the people's temporary "analgesic"."The people's desire and growing in my heart" is the mind of political leaders, but it is difficult to distinguish what people want. It is necessary to have wisdom and courage to eliminate those policies that see the trees and the shortcomings.
