Zeng Yongchang
Food safety issues, "agriculture and rural" problems, migrant workers and the gap between urban and rural areas behind them, gap between workers and peasants, and the problem of gap between the central and western regions are essentially land issues.We choose the collective land real estate rights system, which should be better than that of Chinese landlords before the liberation of China, and now capitalists in Western countries such as the United States and other western countries are good.But the fact is not.
Brown, director of the Institute of U.S. Earth Policy, put forward the century question of "Who will support China in the 21st century?"China attaches great importance to development. Of course, development can be given back to survival, but improper treatment and development can worsen survival.For 28 years in Brown Century, food safety is still the destiny of China, and the crisis behind it is still deepening, which shows that China does not deal with the relationship between survival and development.Chinese cities can get rich. Why is farmers' wealth, the question is to retreat from the land country, and the government competes with the people.If you do not start with land issues, migrant workers, food safety and "agriculture, rural areas" issues and the problems of urban and rural areas, workers, peasants, and central and western regions may never be solved.
People are nostalgic for their homeland. It is helpless.This helplessness keeps China's food safely in its own hands.If China's food security continues to be pinched and exported by food, or is pinched by natural disasters and human disasters. In today's geopolitical game environment, it is likely to become a breakthrough in China's economy and society.
So this is the case. The problem is that the collective land real estate rights in China are not clear. The fake collective state -owned state -owned state -owned state -owned state -owned state -owned state -owned state -owned state, the government did not let go, the capital did not dare to go to the countryside, and the modern intensive agriculture could not be realized.The land system arrangement of the poor scissors allows farmers to have no constant production and perseverance. Therefore, the issue of "agriculture, rural areas" exists, and farmers are poverty. A village committee and peasant group without land expectations have nothing to do with food safety.
From the perspective of economics, the three farmers are actually China's rural economic platform. Land is the basic supply, while grain and peacekeeping industry are the main output.Different land system supply will inevitably cause different land production.
The collective movement after 1949 was the first wave of land nations to retreat.However, after the land collective of farmers, the output released by the system is not ideal.The high -yielding satellites released by the Great Leap Forward in 1958 destroyed Chinese agriculture. The "Grain Pass" from 1960 to 1962 caused China to be punished by anti -science.In 1979, the disorder of the land was retired from the implementation of the land of the land.However, around 2000, a large -scale land country would retreat again.The characteristics of the retirement of the land of the land country this time have previously been forced to collect collective land to be converted into state -owned land and make money with land. Today, the supply and marketing cooperatives have launched land custody and land shares to build a new countryside, which has completely lost farmers to lose the land.Is the rural areas that farmers can't stay?
The development of land sales is a non -returning path.Local selling land does make a lot of money, but most of the money to sell iron in various places is used in road repair, house repair, construction and development zones, issuing civil servants' salary, stability to maintain stability, and increase the preparation of institutions and institutions.After smashing a lot of money, in every place, capital ate food and carry a debt on his back.What should I do if I go to the grassroots research?Some county leaders told me, "No money, a terrible one, I can't control so much."The essence of the country's entry and the people of the land is to allow farmers, rural, agricultural, and collective land to settle back the rise of cities, industry, and eastern parts.The problem is that farmers' land -packaged honeymoon periods are complete, but they have caused the contradiction between the survival and development of the survival and development of the survival and development of food safety in urban and rural areas, workers, peasants, and central and western regions today.Therefore, the reason why agriculture and rural areas are today are the errors of the institutional mechanism and the error of the development strategy.
Looking back now, in the 40 years of reform and opening up, China has still thought of food safety and wealth.In the future, you may have to start with the constant production, and return to the people to allow farmers to live and work in peace.As long as farmers live and work in peace, the decision -making layer does not have to worry about whether the food safety is returning farmland to forests or returning to forests, or how to build a new countryside.
Economic construction also should also talk about development costs.Why China's development cost is high because the government supervises itself.China was severely punished after 1997 to protect cultivated land, but it did not restrict the abuse of crazy curve overtaking and leapfrog development.Many people choose the decision logic of land finance as a shortcut development. In the future, the income after urbanization and industrialization will be used to make up for the losses of sacrificing cultivated land and sacrificing the development of the three farmers, but the end is contrary to their wishes.
China has also spent a lot of money to promote scientific research on grain production, but although there are many scientific research results, the value of promotion is not great.Because the cultivated land to support the Chinese, 1.8 billion mu of 1.8 billion acres is a red line, but the mission of land finance is to sell land, especially high -quality arable land around the city.Finally, severe punishment became a waste paper.Subjective wants to use the achievements of urbanization and industrialization to give back to the three farmers, but before the expectations of urbanization and industrialization are expected, the economic market sank.The real estate, infrastructure, real economy, cultural tourism economy, and development zone that are promoted by spending effort to promote has set up a stall, and now the three farmers have paid more people to pay.
As for grain production research, it is more wishful thinking.At present, the agriculture and rural areas are facing two major dilemma. First, due to the crazy deprivation of the land -to -people retreat to the collective land economy, the farmers' own collective land is left.The gap between the central and western parts.Second, due to the long -term elimination of hundreds of millions of farmers' medical insurance and social security in public policy, let alone education and pensions, the state owed farmers, agriculture, and rural areas.EssenceThis is the serious sequelae of sacrifice for survival and development.
There is no doubt how to deal with land problems is the key to Chinese -style modernization.China's current main contradiction is not to use administrative resources to control house prices to decline (one is that it cannot be controlled, and the other is that the cost of control is too large), continue to economic expansion, expand the gap between urban and rural, workers, peasants, and central and western regions.The retreat of the land of the land evacuated, evoking the driving force of farmers' independent innovation.However, China has been retreating in the land of the land or the retreat of the country's entrance to the people, and it seems that it cannot go out of misunderstanding.How can we achieve modernization as follows?
The author is a Sichuan economist and researcher in China
