Ming Pao News Agency
A primary school teacher was accused of propagating Hong Kong independence information through teaching plans and teaching materials, and was nailed to the Education Bureau.Teachers are the only professional in the government. It is the most severe punishment to cancel registering for life. It is the most severe punishment.According to the bureau, the design, arrangement and arrangement of relevant teaching plans and textbooks are indeed inappropriate.In conjunction, there is an appeal mechanism to follow up. The parties think that it is also a way to propose a judicial appeal.The political struggle in Hong Kong is fierce, and the campus is unfortunately involved in the vortex. The school should try its best to avoid educational politics. Teachers must also abide by their majors and inspire students to think diverse and not become political instillation.
The design of the lesson plans should be reasonable
Baddish and unrealistic majors
The teaching plan and textbooks that are accused of promoting Hong Kong independence have appeared in the Primary Five Life Education Division that appeared in a elementary school.The incident occurred in March last year, that is, before the anti -repair routine storm, according to the Education Bureau, the lesson plan was planned to have a 50 -minute class time, and the association regulations brought out the banned Hong Kong ethnic parties.Including the films that the convener Chen Haotian accepted the interview, and then 35 minutes of teaching time, continued to talk about the Hong Kong National Party, and touched the issues of Tibetan independence, Xinjiang independence, Taiwan independence, and split land.Some people have proposed Hong Kong independence.
The school said that the theme of the classroom involved is freedom of speech. Playing current affairs programs involving Hong Kong independence is only an entry point, and related work paper does not have reference answers.In fact, the theme of Hong Kong independence is not neglected for a while, but to publicize Hong Kong independence in a planned manner. Therefore, the bureau is nailed.Concreated and warned respectively.In the past, teachers were mostly related to the case of weathering. This time the incident was unprecedented. Some people believed that it was political suppression, and some people thought it was a chaos anyway.
Hong Kong and secondary schools pursue the principle of school -based. The school level is high and low, and the classroom design is different.The elementary school involved in this time will talk about international current affairs issues in the high school education section, such as Brexit and Islamic State. However, whether the elementary school environment is suitable for discussing complex political issues, it is really questionable.High school education focuses on independent thinking. In contrast, elementary school students are still absorbing the basic knowledge stage. It is difficult to compare with high school students or college students.It is inevitable to be led by teachers.One of the questions about the work paper involved in the case is based on the content of the film, answering what the reason for Hong Kong independence is, and students do not have room for personal opinions. They can only remember the content of the film to answer the question.
Primary school students are not easy to master the concept of abstraction. If teachers want high school students to recognize the freedom of speech, they should first let the children have a comprehensive awareness of this concept. The materials should also be personal and focus on daily life.The freedom of speech is not the concept of the four words. There are many places to discuss it. For example, the court's decision mentioned that the freedom of speech is not completely unlimited. As for how to delineate the specific boundaryTo talk about this, it may be necessary to spend most of the classrooms. It is not enough to talk about the provisions of the Basic Law and the World Human Rights Declaration on freedom of speech.If the design of the lesson plans, most of the time talks about the Hong Kong independence, and the illegal organization of the Hong Kong National Party, it is obviously wrong, deviating from the original educational purpose of explaining freedom of speech.
There is confusion in the education industry
Understand the demands according to the mechanism
In addition to the general direction, some details of the lesson plans are also problematic.The lesson plan is that students imagine that the grouping activities with classmates may be illegal communities, and it is obviously biased; whether the lesson plans ask students to agree with the Hong Kong national party and government, and whether the teacher -student interaction is fully explained and fully explained.Teaching plans, textbooks, and working paper are all teaching tools designed by teachers. Each detail reflects the teacher's thoughts. Any obviously true and distorted statement should not appear.
In 2016, the source of the students who have been dissolved call for Hong Kong independence on the campus. At that time, the Education Bureau emphasized that if the campus talks about Hong Kong independence issues, it should be based on the Basic Law. Teachers should lead students to clearly understand that the Hong Kong independence does not meet the constitutional constitutional constitutional constitutionWith legal status, if there are teachers advocating Hong Kong independence on the campus, they must bear the consequences, including possible to be nailed.This time is the first time that the Education Bureau has been put into action. There is no precedent support. Whether it is judgment, penalties, or procedural processing, it is inevitable.For example, the Education Bureau said that the teachers involved in the investigation had sufficient opportunities to report and help the assistance of legal consultants., Questioning the authority of the authorities and the punishment.
The authorities believe that the teachers involved have planned Hong Kong independence. Based on whether they are sufficient, whether there are any procedures, whether the punishment of the teachers and peers involved is reasonable, different people have their own opinions.Trust most of the teachers, but some people in the educational community do not know the government's handling criteria and feel confused, and it is also understandable.The Education Bureau has the power to kill the teacher's career. This incident will become an important case in the future. Whether the bureau's practice is reasonable to understand or not to understand; whether the current system is sufficient or transparency, it is also worth looking for it.The Education Bureau has an appeal mechanism. If the parties are questionable, they can also resort to judicial review and ask the court to follow up.At the same time, the education community should adhere to professionalism. Even if social tears are seriously opposed, they cannot affect education work because of their personal political opinions.
