Society: Who is the National Treasure of the Forbidden City

Source: China Times Society

The Kuomintang's all -generation meeting has once again set off a discussion of the Kuomintang government's move to Taiwan and the national treasure attribution of the Palace Museum. Chairman Jiang Qichen low -key respect for multiple opinions. Former Chairman Zhu Lilun visited the Forbidden City high -profile, emphasizing that the National Palace Palace's national treasure belonged to the Republic of China, and it means that he also means that he also means to point out.It is said that we are the descendants of Chinese culture, and his actions are full of politics.

Over the years, the issue of the national treasures and the relocation of gold in the Forbidden City from time to time has been speculated on the public opinion field from time to time, but always coming to rush, only the value of saliva.Thinking with reason and common sense should understand that gold and the national treasure of the Forbidden City belong to China, and the government of the Republic of China brings Taiwan. It should belong to the Chinese people and currently store Taiwan.The so -called gold and national treasures belong to the Kuomintang, but the blue camp people are dissatisfied with the DPP's attempt to overthrow the Republic of China.

However, the Democratic Progressive Party has changed its awareness of the Republic of China.Ten years ago, Tsai Ing -wen held the government of the exile of the Republic of China, but after re -administration in 2016, he began to establish Taiwan's Taiwan discussion.The key to this set of discussions lies in two points: one -size -fits -all and summarizes.

A knife is based on 1949, and basically ignores the connection with the mainland in the 38th year of the Republic of China. However, it emphasizes that the constitutional foundation and institutional evolution path of Taiwan ’s Republic of China in 70 years, as well as the status quo that does not belong to the same country as the other country.In general, the old elements that exist in the status quo are respected and reserved at this stage, but do not reject the use of new method coverage, dilute or gradually change the old elements, so that the importance, decisiveness and influence of old elements continue to decline., Until zero.

Therefore, in the Democratic Progressive Party of China in Taiwan, the Democratic Progressive Party of China, Hao Baicun and others were interpreted as defending Taiwan's freedom and democracy; Li Denghui set the national uniform program in the early days of his office, realizing that Gu Wang's talks were interpreted as promoting the cross -strait sides of the straitThe relationship is normalized.As for the constitutional system, the national treasure of the Forbidden City, the national emblem on the passport, the national emblem, China Airlines, the Central Research Institute (Latin translation of the Chinese Academy), etc.New techniques are diluted and covered.

After all, political socialization is a process that occurs at the same time in many fields such as family, schools, society, media, and national policies.With the passage of time, the replacement of generations, and the evolution of the system, the effect of gradual reform is undoubtedly the best and most delicate. The social tear and major controversy caused by Chen Shui -bian's flames of that year have been by Tsai Ing -wen in Taiwan, the Republic of China of the Republic of China.Instead of ideological engineering.In the face of this reality, the Kuomintang has fallen into a dilemma.

Compared with the Democratic Progressive Party, the Kuomintang, including Zhu Lilun, has fallen into the dilemma of cross -strait routes and cannot extricate themselves.The cause of the Kuomintang's discussion is not pro -beauty, nor do they have to consensus these issues in 1992, but that the interpretation right of the Republic of China is no longer in the hands, especially when facing Beijing.Although there is still room for the mainland to leave Taiwan, the mainland has completed the establishment of the history of the Republic of China in the mainland.He cares about the issue of the history of the Republic of China that fights against the people's Republic of China.At this National Conference, the Kuomintang re -interpreted the 1992 consensus into the Constitution of the Republic of China. Then, what is the relationship between the Constitution of the Republic of China and China is ambiguous.Once again, the confusion of cross -strait routes is not the issue of the 1992 consensus, but in the understanding of the connotation of the Republic of China.

Although the Kuomintang could not re -pick up the discussion of the Republic of China that counterattacked the mainland, democratic anti -communist unification has also become a self -talk of the same temperature.Similarly, if the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China are tied and Chen, they will also enter the traps of the two countries.Originally, Ma Ying -jeou's one -China table happened to be in the middle, but Tsai Ing -wen's Taiwan Republic of China was replaced.So, how can the Kuomintang's new discussion of the Republic of China break the question?

The National Treasure of the Forbidden City of Taipei can be inspired.The first half of the Republic of China is the Chinese nation and the Chinese culture, and the Republic of China is the Republic of the Republic of China, the people's governance, and the people.If Taiwanese are not Chinese, if there is no free democratic system, there will be no national treasures of the Forbidden City today.Of course, the national treasure of the Forbidden City is not the Kuomintang Party, nor is it not just the assets of the Republic of China, but the testimony of the essence of the Chinese nation's historical and cultural and the free democratic system.

Zhu Lilun said that the national treasure of the Forbidden City belongs to the Republic of China and we are the heirs of Chinese culture. This is not enough. It also needs to further explain the inseparable relationship between the Republic of China and China in order to clearly understand the relationship between the national treasure and Taiwan.The Kuomintang needs to build a new Republic of China that can bring the new hope of all Taiwanese, Chinese, and Chinese in the world.