Ming Pao News Agency

Hong Kong's popular community testing plans, with a total of 550,000 citizens registered online for 3 days.At present, there are sufficient testing capabilities in Hong Kong to popularize community testing plans. Of course, the most ideal is the participation of the whole people. However, the ideal is often a distance from reality. Considering the slowdown of the epidemic affects the intention of some people's participation in the test, and the high political opposition of Hong Kong's high political opposition, it has originally.It is difficult to expect millions of people to participate.The large -scale community screening, the goal is to find out more invisible communication chains. Citizens should actively participate. As long as the human and material resources permit, the more the virus detection must be better, even if it is not actively supported, there is no reason to negatively hinder the destruction.The epidemic is repeatedly changed, and the third wave has faded. It does not rule out that the fourth and fifth waves of the fifth and fifth waves after the winter are not excluded. Hong Kong needs to prepare for sustainable social and economic activities. Even if this popular community testing eventually, there are only about one million people in the end.Participation is still a useful warm -up.

Slowing epidemic affects participation

Detecting politics is unfavorable to promote

The popular community testing plan has officially launched today. In the past three days, with an average of nearly 200,000 citizens registered online and appointments per day. The 141 community testing centers in Hong Kong are currently full of 10 % of the test periods.The popularity of community testing plans originated from the national test initiative. The authorities emphasized that the popularization testing can help to find invisible infections, which is of great significance to control the epidemic.It is quite political; people with different political camps have different interpretations of the registration situation and citizens.

The online appointment registration is still ongoing, and the number of participants will be involved in the future.Earlier, some government consultant experts said that 5 million people were involved in the current trend, and this wish can be certain.The participation of 5 million people is the most ideal situation in terms of epidemic prevention, but the reality is often a lot of distance from the ideal.Setting high goals for large -scale communities will only be unrealistic.

The positiveness of the public participation in popularizing testing is directly proportional to the severity of the epidemic. It is a reasonable assumption. Recently, a family of five people with takeaway campaign in Tseung Kwan Australia has a five -person infection.Full fullness can be regarded as a specific example.However, the overall epidemic in Hong Kong is gradually slowing down. Yesterday, a single -day confirmed case was recorded. Compared with the peaks a few weeks ago, there were 100 days in the peak.It affects participation in test enthusiasm.At the same time, Hong Kong's society tears and opposes, and has permeated political distrust. Once the matter involves the central and the Mainland, someone will inevitably resist.The people of the Hong Kong Government have lowered, and mobilizing citizens to participate in testing are originally difficult. The popularization of the testing plan is assisted by the Mainland, and the situation becomes more politicized.

In the past, the ability to detect virus in Hong Kong has been repeatedly criticized. With the support of the Mainland, not only can the original high -risk people and specific group tests be done, and even the spare no effort for large -scale community screening. From the perspective of epidemic prevention, this should be a good thing.At the beginning of the proposal of the popularity of the test plan, some people immediately tested the test to collect political conspiracy theories such as the Hong Kong people DNA. The authorities and experts repeatedly emphasized that there is no possibility of this.And other issues.Some people mention that the CDC (CDC) has recently revised guidelines and believes that asymptomatic people do not need to detect, and some people mention that WHO believes that the popularity of the popularity of the whole people is too high and unrealistic (Costly and Unrealistic), Yunyun.

Different places have different epidemic conditions, and the prevention measures are different.Although experts' views on the strategy of the immigration have gradually converged, there are still many differences in specific practices.The US CDC revised virus test guidelines caused many local health experts to attack. Michael Mina, Harvard's infectious psychologist, described that those who did not detect asymptomatic infections were definitely backward.However, considering that there are too many cases in the United States and can no longer cope with a large number of false positive cases, the authorities can reduce the sensitivity of detection.WHO's experts have always started from the global situation. Most countries have insufficient immune resources. Of course, WHO must encourage them to give priority to using resources on the most needed people.

Whether to participate in the personal decision

Call for the overall interests of Ge 违 违

At the beginning of the global epidemic outbreak, World Wei did not advocate that the people were wearing masks, which was very different from Hong Kong experts. One major reason was that the global mask supply was tight at that time.The problem of virus testing, WTO is most concerned about the lack of resources in many countries, and some countries want to be soft hands and feet.In order to avoid detecting the lack of resources in the area, WHO cannot casually advocate the popularization of community testing. However, Hong Kong as a place with abundant resistance resources in the world, from masks from the people to the community to popularize the test.Instead, there are owed to the general public.

The role of popular community testing in different scenarios is different. When the epidemic explosion or this momentum, the high -sensitivity detection tools are used to combine the banning of the banner, etc., but it does not mean that it is useless to put in other scenes.The source of 30 % of the cases in Hong Kong is unknown, reflecting that the community still has an invisible transmission chain. The more people participate in the test, the more the opportunity to find out the potential communicator.It also has a positive effect.The popularity of community testing is a voluntary nature. No matter what the citizens are considered or not, they are personal freedom. However, from the consideration of overall social interests, even if they do not support or participate in the plan, they should not be negatively obstruct or call for Cup.The epidemic is from time to time. No matter how the number of participants are popularized, this time is an important experience, allowing all parties to understand the operation of popularity, threatening the future of the epidemic, and to lay the basis for rapid adaptation.