Three reasons for Beijing cannot be trapd to peer retaliation

Author: Zheng Zhen

Source: Hong Kong 01

An important thing to pay attention to is that you cannot fall into a trap of peer retaliation.In the trade war, China almost imposed tariffs on American products in accordance with the principle of depending on the principle of depending on your peers.For a period of time, peer retaliation is the norm.The United States closes the Chinese Consulate General in Houston, and the Chinese Consulate General in Chengdu is closed. The United States includes some official media in China in the diplomatic mission. China has adopted new restrictions on the four American media.Similar situations are different.

After the United States' successive moves to Chinese companies, the first response of all parties was to see what China would counter to the United States.In fact, in this game, the United States has not necessarily have peer retaliation measures, and China should not think that any tricks in the United States have a peer response in China.

In the United States, China returned a great one, and it was stabilized by the United States to restrain the energy.The United States blocked Huawei and Tiktok, which was originally wrong. The self -closure of the United States is also a protectiveist and hegemonicism that China opposes it. China does not need to follow it.The door to China will not close because it is going to fight back. The close economic relations between China and the United States need to be maintained. This is the common interest of China and the United States.

The support of the American economic community for cooperation with China is to urge the United States to regain the backbone of China to return to rationality, and it is necessary to strive for strategies and interests.Therefore, China does not have to block the normal business operated by the United States in China.Beijing can completely release a further clear signal, so that more foreign companies in China are at ease.

Emphasis on peer retaliation is a short -sightedness.China's most favorable attack is not reflected in a specific event. The correct direction is more important than any specific peer revenge.

In the process of dealing with Sino -US relations, when there is a strong manner, there is also a weak side. When there is any action, there are any movements, and you need to consider it due to time.It should not be expected that China will retaliate against the United States in anything, nor should China have not retaliated with certain things as a show of weakness or policy transformation.

The comprehensive strength of all aspects of the United States today exceeds China, and the United States' suppression of China is preventive and targeted.Sino -US relations are not equal.In this context, peer retaliation is equivalent to automatically standing on the opposite side of the United States and competition.It is not impossible to surpass the United States in all aspects of the development of China's future development. However, China's goal is not to compete with the United States, and China does not want to fall into a competition with the United States.

The peer -type revenge everywhere is a tactical tactical tactical tactics. In the end, it will only be tired of responding and gradually expose its own shortcomings.China, which maintains the strategic opportunity period, needs to move around and should be careful to deal with the United States' suppression.Sometimes the storms and rain are sometimes gentle, and the means of changes can be diverse. The fundamental purpose is only one, that is, this special stage where Sino -US relations are stable.