Lu Siliang: Law is not the same as national power

Perspective collision

The Lianhe Zaobao Speech Edition published on July 7 the decline of Zheng Yongnian's article. Some of the views extended by some of the academic category discussions as a guise, and some discussions are inconsistent with the facts.

First of all, a conclusion was explained in the text: No society becomes equal as the imagination of liberalism, society will always be hierarchical, and the ruler will always exist.At the beginning, I thought it was wrong. Or is it the author's point of view or citing a liberalist?Read the context carefully and confirm that this is right. This is how the author said.

This preaching and Zhang Yang seemed too naked.

Ask, who is still using this set of rotten, arrogant, and reactionary rules and ruler's confrontation dogma to define and govern the opposition of the ruler and the ruler?Which country's leaders will openly be self -proclaimed by the level first, and despise the general public as the ruler?Even so, there are probably very few private dynasties like North Korea.

The new local election has just passed, if there are any competitors during the campaign, a slight show on the stage shows that they are a rulers candidate, and call on the ruler to vote for support.Political jokes.

Furthermore, the text also proposed: What does the law mean?The law represents the expansion of the country's power on behalf of the country and the law.Such a statement not only is not strict and do whatever he wants, but also has the suspicion of the power of the country that is swollen and unrestrained.

Looking at the historical process, such as the Ten Moses, that is also the first legal provision in the world. It is a ten provisions issued by religious prophets to the Israeli nation.Relationship does not mean any power.

Law, from pure definition, is a system composed of rules to regulate personal behavior.

That is to say, it is a contract for all individuals. Its original meaning is not to grant the country or any party organization with the supreme power that can be expanded at will, nor is it recognizing that the state and the state can survive the individual without restrictions.Above the community.

Nowadays, people mention the term law, which mostly refers to the concept of linked to the rule of law.For the time being, the Wiki -in -the -base entry that quotes the term of the rule of law mdash; mdash; refers to the premise and basic legislation of public opinion authorization, strictly govern the country according to the law, and use power as the key social management mechanism, social activities and social order.The rule of law is closely related to constitutional government. The connotation not only requires all people to abide by the law, but also focuses on the control and restraint of government power.In a country of rule of law, the power of the country is subject to the restrictions on the authorities' arbitrary exercise of public power to achieve the right to protect citizens.

In this way, it is obvious that the law is exactly opposed to the country in a sense, playing a balance of balance, and it is not a matter of law representing the country, or even more straightforward. In essence, it is a more distorted national representative law.

There is also a problem here, which is often discussed and corrected, and the difference between Rule of Law and Rule by Law (ruled by usage).

If the Rule by Law is advocated, it is that the law is a tool for the government to manage the country and the society, and the purpose of formulating the law is to control the people.In a word, the law is used as a ruling tool.

Following this clue, the legal representative of the country should be said for granted, and that, it also co -produced with the concept of the rulers and the ruler; but it can not steal the beams and change the pillars.Through the rules.

The reason is simple. There are still many unrighteous claims in this world that abandon the above, and it is sincere and continuously practiced by the Rule of Law creed, including Singapore.

Somehow, Zheng Wen's beginning was not rushing to directly reach the theme of liberal decline, but said that there was a large paragraph of other words: the institutional system developed by China was built on its own culture and civilization.And at the international level, this system has begun to focus on other countries (especially developing countries).Although China itself is not interested, it is necessary to output its own institutional system in the international community, hellip;

It is said that China's current institutional system is built on its own culture and civilization. If China ’s thousands of years of culture and civilization, in the sense of the institutional system, it refers to the generation of generations of dynasties, then it returns to the above.The ruler, the ruler and the law of the ruler are the disputed elements of the tools of the rule. It is not worthy of refuting on a wider level.

As for that China itself has no intention to export its own institutional system in the international community, I think this is not able to stand up, because it is not consistent with the facts.

In recent years, many moves in China, including comprehensive carrying with the United States and the Western world, competing for leadership and discourse rights of various international organizations, forming and displaying the formation and display of wolf -type diplomatic styles, and promoting the strategic layout of the Belt and Road Initiative.China has the ambition to comprehensively listen to international affairs, occupying the global political and economic system, and the ambition to sell its institutional advantages around the world.

This trend and pattern have also been a wide consensus of politicians and famous scholars in various countries around the world.

A clear discussion in the internal publicity and guidance documents issued by China is the best proof of proof: we must strive to focus on and highlight the superiority of the Chinese system, Chinese roads, Chinese solutions, Chinese claims, and Chinese wisdom.EssenceXi Jinping pointed out: LSquo; Contemporary China is experiencing the most profound and extensive social changes in our country's history, and it is also carrying the most magnificent and unique practical innovation in human history.rsquo; We must focus on these innovative practices, tell the story of China's development, and spread the voice of Chinese.For example, a problem that is difficult to solve the problem of the division of the rich and the poor in the capitalist world can increase the external reporting efforts of poverty alleviation.The efficient leadership of the Communist Party highlights the institutional superi; hellip;

This is the famous saying: Communists never hide their views.

There is another way of exporting systems that involve and even hurt the principles of international law. It also makes the neighboring countries in Southeast Asia.Based on the historical rights that cannot be discussed (may also belong to a pioneering work built on its own culture and civilization), the nine -segment line requires the muscles to show muscles and frequently reveal the attempt to use coercion or force to resolve sea power disputes.

There is no substantial solution to the hot topic of progress so far, and once again focused on the fundamental problem of the law in the vision of the people all over the world: a country, especially the big country of mouth, respect the rules -based international order?If the treaty that he has signed and has a legal binding is called a waste paper, it will be granted a handle.Politics and leaders of some countries have repeatedly accused China of the lack of legal basis for the law that imposed its will to a certain region, and it is not completely unreasonable to my opinion.

Of course, with the intention of institutional competition and institutional output, it is another thing that can be achieved in the event of imagination.

The author has served as the technical manager of the semiconductor industry, and now retires