Early
Ji Yan Chunqiu
In response to the highly anticipated incident, Shandong Province officially announced the results of the investigation on July 3rd. The class teacher Qiu Yinlin and his daughter Qiu Xiaohui of Gou Jing high school were investigated and punished.However, the protagonist Gou Jing, who disclosed the incident, also fell into a new wave of public opinion.
Judging from the official report, in 1997, Gou Jing, who took the first time to participate in the college entrance examination, reached the technical secondary school admission score line, but she did not fill in her volunteer and chose to repeat it.Her class teacher Qiu Yinlin successfully made her daughter Qiu Xiaohui take the college entrance examination scores of Gou Jing through illegal means to read a technical secondary school in Beijing.After graduating from Qiu Xiaohui, he participated in the work in Rencheng Teacher School of Rencheng District, Jining City in the name of Gou Jing.
In 1998, Gou Jing, who participated in the college entrance examination for the second time, only passed the secondary score line, and was transferred to the Hubei Huanggang Water Conservancy Power School.Gou Jing went to this school and graduated, and there was no problem with the second time that others were replaced by school.
The basic context of the Gou Jing incident is: Qiu Xiaohui, under the planning and operation of his father Qiu Yinlin, used Gou Jing's grade to get a technical secondary school degree; Gou Jing gave up the opportunity to enter the first technical secondary school, and took the college entrance examination again.I went to a junior high school.
There is no doubt that Qiu Yinlin's father and daughter's behavior was suspected of illegal, and was officially investigated and taken for mandatory measures.The relevant personnel who helped Qiu Yinlin's father and daughter to open up the joints were also punished by different degrees.There is not much controversy for this result.
But the Gou Jing incident Yu Bo was not.In the past few days, her integrity has become the focus of public opinion.
Before the investigation results were released, Gou Jing described himself as a victim who had excellent results but was replaced by college twice.After disclosing the truth of the incident, she and her family were threatened by Qiu Yinlin and local forces. Qiu Yinlin even threatened her with four strong men to her current work.
Gou Jing's narrative has attracted great attention from public opinion: the college entrance examination is considered to be the best way for Chinese civilians to change their fate, but Gou Jing, a school hegemony from a poor family in rural areas, was deprived of the evil forces to study in a good university.Is the right to the right of the college entrance examination?
Affected by the epidemic of coronary disease, China's college entrance examination this year was postponed to July 7.On the eve of the college entrance examination, a series of competing incidents broke out in Shandong, especially the Gou Jing incident that was taken away twice, which exacerbated the public's concerns about social fairness and justice.For a while, Gou Jing, who was an e -commerce in Zhejiang, became a typical example of self -improvement and bravery, which attracted a large number of netizens to support and support.
However, the official survey results largely reversed the opinion of public opinion on Gou Jing, because people found that the narrative of Gou Jing was very different from facts.
For example, her two college entrance examination results explained that she did not go to college and was replaced because she gave up her volunteer; she repeatedly said that after being replaced the next year, she inexplicably accepted a pheasant school.Just left.But the fact is that this is a regular college school. She was adjusted to this school to meet her willingness to adjust, and she completed her studies in this school.
In addition, Qiu Yinlin disclosed by Gou Jing took a few strong men to threaten her family and her own plot, and it was also confirmed that it was serious.After the Gou Jing incident was fermented, the 77 -year -old Qiu Yinlin did try to communicate with her son to Gou Jing's work unit, but after Gou Jing persisted, he left himself.
Of course, Gou Jing gave up the volunteer that year, not the reason why Qiu Yinlin's father and daughter used her to go to school.Gou Jing revealed that Qiu Yinlin's father and daughter's illegal acts were justice, but the illegal acts of Qiu Yinlin and others should not be an excuse for the basic facts of Gou Jing to distort.
After the survey results came out, Gou Jing asked the netizen in the video: Even if I exaggerated his words, what did you lose?What did you lose?
This attitude obviously irritated many people, and also made Gou Jing become the object of public opinion from the victim he described.At the same time, many netizens defended Gou Jing's words and deeds, and believed that she should not be faulty of her, but should focus on the issue of maintaining fairness of the college entrance examination.
Indeed, the Gou Jing incident caused such a strong response, mainly due to the public's attention to the college entrance examination and other social fair issues.In the context of fraud in the college entrance examination, this kind of attention is of course justified, and the society is an effective supervision of the fairness of the college entrance examination.Officials must always be vigilant and severely punish those who are fraudulent for college entrance examinations in order to maintain the public's confidence in the college entrance examination.
But on the other hand, Gou Jing's character setting collapse after the truth is exposed, indicating that integrity is the basis for maintaining justice.Because the true fairness and justice cannot be achieved by distorting or even facing facts.
