Since the outbreak of the Coronary Virus crisis, states in the United States have formulated some policies to limit the freedom of residents.However, in some states, especially the Democratic Party, the governor is obviously a dictator, and the administrative order promulgated violates the US Constitution.

Among them, Governor Murphy in New Jersey claimed in an interview with Fox News that he did not consider the claim bill when he issued an order.As soon as this statement came out, American society was uproar.Murphy's approach is no different from Chinese officials.

The purpose of the US Constitution is to establish the government and restrict its power because absolute power leads to absolute corruption.Some restrictions are written in the constitution, and most of the restrictions related to personal freedom can be found in the first ten amendments of the Rights Act.Congress approved these amendments to restrict the federal government's infringement of personal freedom.Since the promulgation and subsequent lawsuits of Article 14 of 1868, these amendments have also largely restricted the power of each state; the court has identified these protected freedom of freedom as the fundamental principle.

Therefore, in the first eight amendments, the right to express or reasonably infer the right to think, speech, news, assembly, worship, self -defense, privacy, travel, property ownership, as well as the right of inter -commercial activities and government fair treatment.Article 9 is a everything that is all -encompassing. It declares the list of the top eight rights, which does not mean that there are no other basic rights, and the government should not degrade these other rights.The 10th amendment reflects the government's power to itself.

The ninth amendment is particularly important to its author Madison, because he believes that natural rights (today are called basic rights) are indispensable for everyone, and there are many quantities and cannot be listed.In the next century, the anti -slave movement will explain this: a person's natural rights are his property, to the entire world; whether it is a person or millions of people, it constitutes a crime to any infringement; whether it is, whether it isA person claims to be a robber or a million people claims to be a government.

Natural rights together constitute the moral ability and sovereign authority of each person's personal choice, and are not intervened or government permission.Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence that the government obtained ownership from the consent of the ruler.Madison understands the ninth amendment, announcing that citizens' personal choices are not intervened by the government, as long as their choices will not harm the rights of others.

It can be seen that if the government intervention in citizens' personal choices and citizens do not agree with their intervention power, their intervention is invalid and illegal, because the personal choices of citizens are protected by the rights bill without being intervened by the government.Government intervention is unconstitutional.

The current intervention of the rights protected by the exercise of the rights of the rights is mainly concentrated in the exercise of travel, rally, inter -commercial business activities and religious beliefs.These infringements come from the governor who claims to have the right to do so, and proposes three profound constitutional issues.

First: Is the governor who has the power to issue administrative orders in an emergency to replace the law?the answer is negative.The guarantee clause of the Constitution requires that the states are republican government.This means that the power is divided into three branches. Each branch has unique functions, and the other two cannot be executed.Because only the agency legislative agencies can formulate criminal punishment and attract the use of force, the governor cannot formulate laws at the constitutional level.

Second: Can state legislative agencies entrust their legislative power to the governor?The answer is no, because the separation of the three powers prevents one government department from cutting its core power to another department.The purpose of separation is not to maintain the integrity of each branch, but to ensure personal freedom by preventing any branch of any branch from accumulating too much power.

Third: Can the national state legislative organs formulate laws to interfere with the personal freedom protected by the rights of the rights, stipulate that the punishment violates these laws, and authorize the governor to use force to force them to obey?The answer is also denied, because all the US governments obey the bill of rights clearly stipulated and are contained in the natural rights of the ninth amendment.

People should be happy to oppose the ignorance and arrogance of the governor, but ignore the protests of the rights bill.In order to defend freedom, it is necessary to resist autocracy.Unlimited power continues to grow and lead to corruption.History tells us that most people prefer safe fantasies, not the hustle and bustle of freedom.The only reason for Americans to have freedom of citizen today is that the founding expensive and revolutionaries fought for them more than 200 years ago.

Today, some states in the United States are ruled by dangerous men and women, because they deprive Americans' ability to make personal choices, and they use force to obey regulations.They not only violated the vow to safeguard the human rights bill, but also infringed the legitimate rights of Americans.When the crisis passes, they will be tried by law because of their destruction of the constitution.The American people will use practical actions to tell these dictators that the constitution is not a waste paper.

(The author is an independent scholar in the United States)