Source: Sing Tao Daily
Middle school diploma test this year's historical test questions, there are necessary answers to ask candidates to comment from 1900 to 1945. The advantages brought by Japan to China are more advantages than disadvantages. During this period, the main history of Japan was Japanese invasion.Proficiency and disadvantages. Such propositions not only touch the basic and wrong value of the country and the nation, but also provide the reference materials it provides, but also the suspicion of diluting the invasion and invasion of China to guide students.Due to major principles and technical issues in the test questions, the Education Bureau urged the Examination and Evaluation Bureau to cancel this question, which is reasonable.The Education Bureau should further investigate. The ins and outs of this test should be found to find various problems hidden in the mechanism and avoid repeating the same mistakes.
The method of arguing that the method is difficult to be convincing
This test question has set off a stir. Some people deliberately dilute their seriousness and reduce the discussion to the technical level. They believe that this is just a way to start a question. The purpose is to trigger students to think about it. Candidates will understand the historical facts that they know and objectively.answer.
Those who start the topic are obviously a sophistry after the problem, and the purpose is to be rationalized for the mistakes they make, but it is difficult to say.Anyone who knows history and international issues knows that different national nations have some non -values at all. They must not violate them. There is no discussion on pros and cons. If they are provocative, they will cause fierce international or domestic conflicts.This time the test was proposed to bring more advantages than the disadvantages of China during the Japanese invasion of China. It is exactly the right and wrong of the Chinese nation. No matter from the perspective of the country and the Chinese, it is not acceptable.The scholars will not know this, and it is inevitable that it is doubtful.
Fourteen years before and after the Japanese invasion of China, the Chinese casualties were tens of millions of injuries. The whole country was caught in unprecedented disasters. The spirit of the Chinese nation included the mainland, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and overseas Chinese as the largest national difficulties in history, so they invaded China to Japan.The condemnation and negation are absolute. Yang Runxiong, director of the Education Bureau, believes that the test questions are more profitable than the disadvantages. In fact, this history has only a disadvantage. Candidates have no room for discussion.That's it.
You can't ask the massacre more than the disadvantage
Imagine if a nation has suffered a massacre, will its citizens ask the massacre in the student test questions more for our nation?In the United States, if the trial question in Middle School asked the slave to be sold to the Americas at that time, it was more advantageous to black people?, Dingfeng will cause racial conflicts.At that time, the Japanese government tampering with the history of invasion in China in textbooks and beautifying the war of war has also stimulated severe diplomatic storms in China and Japan.Various examples can be seen that some of the bottom lines of the big and non -wrong issues cannot be overwhelmed, and it is not based on open thinking, and it can be arbitrarily played without principle.
This question caused a strong response of the society, exposing some fundamental issues that the evaluation bureau filed the test mechanism, especially the disciplines that may involve political stance, such as generals and history.Among them?Are there objective evaluation standards and supervision procedures in the process?In these questions, both the Education Bureau and the Evaluation Bureau must investigate in depth and explain to the public.
