01 Viewpoint
As a world health organization in the world's major public health institutions, is it favorable or hindered to countries from fighting against new crown pneumonia?There is no need to ask for this, but some people just like to match common sense.U.S. President Trump recently announced that he had suspended the suspension of funding for 60 to 90 on the grounds that he had helped China and faced his duty on the grounds that he had condemned public opinion.The epidemic has not ended, and countries should cooperate sincerely and take back 10,000 steps. Even if the United States is unwilling to cooperate, it should not have extraordinary branches, which hinders WTO's performance.
Half of WHO's funds depends on fundraising. For example, the annual donation of the Gates Foundation is 100 million (USD, the same below), and half of the funds come from the funding of member states.According to the sources of two types, the United States is the largest single gold master of WHO.According to the budget of WHO from 2018 to 2019, the United States provides 400 million (15%of the budget), far from more than 200 million in the UK and more than 86 million in China.If Trump's review on the 90s really decide the water throat, it will inevitably cause a certain degree of blow to the WHO, which will not only affect the response to this epidemic, but also affect the work such as Ipora and pediatric paralysis.Richard Horton, editor -in -chief of the British Medical Journal Stranger Magazine, criticized this Crime Against Humanity; Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, who has been in charity for many years, also criticized that Trump has compared to the world than ever in the world.It is dangerous to suspend the current suspension of funding.
In terms of peace, since the outbreak of the epidemic, many decisions of WHO are questionable.For example, it announced that the epidemic was announced on January 23 (the same day Wuhan sealing city) was an international public health emergency (PHEIC), and it was not announced until the 30th that it was questioned that the response was too slow.After pandemic), it was not a big mistake to refer to the effective experience in East Asia. It is also a big mistake to encourage the people to encourage the people to wear masks.If there is a mistake, of course, you can make a review after the epidemic is over. If an official can make mistakes, you can also punish it accordingly, but this is not enough to rationalize the hasty movement of Trunpu's water.It will affect developed countries such as the United States and damage the well -being of the third world.
U.S. outbreak of U.S. outbreak Trump is difficult to hold on responsibility
Now Trump has decided to conduct investigations of the WHO's treatment of epidemics and put on a judge, but this does not cover his own incompetence.To respond to the epidemic, it requires WHO coordination, and the governments of various countries are also required to take the initiative, but the United States has completely failed in this regard.The New York Times reported that Hlen Y. Chu, an expert in infectious diseases in Seattle in late January, proposed to test the coronary virus, but was rejected by the federal and state governments; even at the end of February, Trump still diluted the epidemic, claiming to deal with flu in the wayNew crown pneumonia.The superposition of various errors eventually led to an unpredictable American epidemic.
Trump's punishment of WHO is estimated to transfer the dissatisfaction of citizens to them. This selfish political operation is actually its consistent style.Whether it is withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement or tearing the Iranian nuclear agreement, various cases have proved that the president who advocates the priority of the United States ignores international morals.The greater the responsibility of the national strength, the greater the responsibility of the national strength. Trump is wrong again, and it will only weaken the leadership of the United States, making more people feel more tooth for this superpower.
